Teams

EM RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Wink vs Emily Knight6-0, 6-1
2024-08-28vs WP-O ORANGELost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Lauricella vs Cindy Koch6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-26vs VC PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Mancherian / Lisa LoJacono vs Shannon Kasperbauer / Kathleen Nisbet6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAndrea Lauricella vs Molly Weaver2-6, 1-6
2024-08-21vs GAC PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMika Gans / Andrea Lauricella vs Gwen Hubbard / Kris Stern1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMolly McGill / Jennifer Wink vs Anna Calicchio / Taylor Thornburgh6-3, 6-3
2024-08-07vs GCC PINKWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Wink vs Sachi Osatinski6-3, 6-2
2024-07-31vs CHCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Lauricella / Molly McGill vs Paige Reberry / Jen de Loizaga6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Wink vs Ashley Balakas6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa LoJacono / Amy Dodge vs Laura Koelbel / Monica Zakovich6-2, 6-0
2024-07-24vs PTC SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Sundberg / Andrea Lauricella vs Tekla Petrinovich / Marci Pisciotta6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa LoJacono vs Hayley Servatius6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Andrea Lauricella
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.51
Kristen Mancherian
published
2.36
Lisa LoJacono
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Amy Dodge
published 2.5
2.31
Elizabeth Sundberg
published
2.31
Molly McGill
published
2.25
Jennifer Wink
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Mika Gans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Dodge + Kristen Mancherian12168% games+15.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Sundberg + Andrea Lauricella404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Dodge + Elizabeth Sundberg213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Wink + Elizabeth Sundberg213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Wink + Andrea Lauricella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Lauricella
60W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Kristen Mancherian
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Lisa LoJacono
49W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Amy Dodge
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
Elizabeth Sundberg
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
Molly McGill
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Jennifer Wink
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25
Mika Gans
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.