Teams

Tan - SHL

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-09vs Gross - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Maureen Proctor vs Kimberly Fortier / Oliva Smith6-7, 0-6
2025-10-02vs Marsden - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Dodi Stringfellow vs Alisha Krecidlo / Kim Gall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Rick - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesAivel Dadisman / Cherie Tan vs Michelle Washington / Kelly Brown6-2, 6-0
2025-09-11vs Jasionowski - RS HardWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Gonterman / Ashley Keigley vs Katie Cooper-Bussell / Alicia Trawick7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDarcy Meredeth / LeeAnn Ruffin vs Rhonda Springer / Susan Harberson6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Isakson / Rachel Reis vs Lisa Smith / Alicia Brizuela7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-28vs Ross - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelanie DiLoreto / Jessica Gonterman vs Bonnie Bucco / Thuy Nguyen5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Caster / Cara Tenpenny vs Kathy Ross / Trish Kington7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshley Crossland / Jennifer Scott vs Arlene Bronola / Jessic Melton6-0, 6-3
2024-10-29Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaria Hicks / Aivel Dadisman vs Michelle Patterson / Karen Penn6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Caster / Jessica Gonterman vs Megan Frederick / Jacqueline Wallace6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Melanie DiLoreto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Aivel Dadisman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ashley Keigley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Cara Tenpenny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Melissa Caster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ashley Crossland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Darcy Meredeth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
LeeAnn Ruffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Annie Malone
published 3
2.48
Francine Costa
published
2.40
Jessica Isakson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Rachel Reis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Gonterman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maria Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Melanie DiLoreto
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Aivel Dadisman
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ashley Keigley
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Cara Tenpenny
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Melissa Caster
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ashley Crossland
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Darcy Meredeth
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
LeeAnn Ruffin
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Annie Malone
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
Francine Costa
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Jessica Isakson
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Rachel Reis
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Jessica Gonterman
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.