Teams

KY/LEX/Hardesty/McCubbin

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 9.0 Combined

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-09vs KY/LEX/EDENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Sullivan / Joseph Twerdi vs Steve Holsclaw / Zan Rexroat6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Ray / Jim Concotelli vs Mark Telfer / Lee Robinson6-1, 6-3
2025-02-10vs KY/LEX/EDENWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Concotelli / John Herring vs Michael Eden / Robert Rosenberg6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharles Ray / John Bogusewski vs Steve Holsclaw / Lee Robinson7-5, 6-2
2025-01-08vs KY/LEX/EDENWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Weiss / Joseph Twerdi vs Zan Rexroat / Steve Holsclaw6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Atwell / Erritt Griggs vs Michael Eden / Michael Lewis6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Sullivan / Keith Henry vs Eric Sauvage / Lee Robinson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Ken Putlak
published
4.39
John Bogusewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Vijay Kannan
published
4.24
John Herring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Ron Harper
published
4.07
William McCubbin
published
4.04
Erritt Griggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
David Atwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
David Hardesty
published 4.5
3.93
Ched Crouse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.83
Keith Henry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jim Concotelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joseph Twerdi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erritt Griggs + David Atwell5161% gamesnot enough data
Ched Crouse + William McCubbin5070% gamesnot enough data
John Herring + David Hardesty303 matchesnot enough data
John Herring + John Bogusewski303 matchesnot enough data
Ken Putlak + Vijay Kannan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Putlak
22W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
John Bogusewski
24W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Vijay Kannan
34W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
John Herring
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
Ron Harper
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
William McCubbin
48W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Erritt Griggs
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
David Atwell
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
David Hardesty
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Ched Crouse
131W–30L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Keith Henry
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jim Concotelli
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Joseph Twerdi
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.