Teams

KY/LEX/EDEN

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 9.0 Combined

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-09vs KY/LEX/Hardesty/McCubbinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Holsclaw / Zan Rexroat vs Daniel Sullivan / Joseph Twerdi3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Telfer / Lee Robinson vs Charles Ray / Jim Concotelli1-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs KY/LEX/Hardesty/McCubbinLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Eden / Robert Rosenberg vs Jim Concotelli / John Herring2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Holsclaw / Lee Robinson vs Charles Ray / John Bogusewski5-7, 2-6
2025-01-08vs KY/LEX/Hardesty/McCubbinLost 02
L#1 DoublesZan Rexroat / Steve Holsclaw vs George Weiss / Joseph Twerdi3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEric Sauvage / Lee Robinson vs Daniel Sullivan / Keith Henry3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Steve Holsclaw
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
James Hollander
published
3.79
Zan Rexroat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Eugene Toth
published
3.59
Rick Prior
published
3.54
Dan Hollingshead
published 4
3.52
Robert Rosenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Lee Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Eric Sauvage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Telfer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Eden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zan Rexroat + Steve Holsclaw8552% games+1.8% vs expected
Lee Robinson + Rick Prior0633% games−5.8% vs expected
Zan Rexroat + Eugene Toth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Holsclaw
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
James Hollander
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Zan Rexroat
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Eugene Toth
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Rick Prior
8W–37L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Dan Hollingshead
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Robert Rosenberg
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lee Robinson
3W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Eric Sauvage
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Telfer
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Eden
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.