Teams

F 3.0S/6.0D CV Carroll

2023 NEOTA Fusion · NEOTA 3.0S

22 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA 3.0S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1F 3.0S/6.0D MV2 Ung81341126261
2F 3.0S/6.0D LT Savelieff81301540337
3F 3.0S/6.0D CC1 Dixon72281735320
4F 3.0S/6.0D PM Whitlam54261942339
5F 3.0S/6.0D MV1 Beebe45212452401
6F 3.0S/6.0D FRR McNamara45202552390
7F 3.0S/6.0D CV Carroll45202554375
8F 3.0S/6.0D PW Merugu36202554413
9F 3.0S/6.0D CC2 Lombardo27153064442
10F 3.0S/6.0D TP Licari09113471461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Roger Lee
published
3.33
Kristin Hofer
published
3.23
Camden Spencer
published 3.5
2.90
Tim Hofer
published
2.83
Emma Parker
published 3
2.82
Ivana Urbanowski
published 3
Carol Duber
published 3
David Deeter
published 3
Dina Fisher
published 3
2.72
Carl Parker
published 3
2.68
2.68
Mamie Manchester
published
2.67
Betsey Poe
published 3
2.63
Dawn Kohn
published 3
2.37
Monica Lozano
published
2.31
Jeffrey Spencer
published
Adam Kohn
published
Jill Carroll
published
Mark Deeter
published
Mike Carroll
published
Nicole Parker
published
Orlando Dangond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Manchester + Tim Hofer4350% games+14.4% vs expected
Tim Hofer + Carl Parker3253% games+7.8% vs expected
Mamie Manchester + Kristin Hofer6557% games+3.9% vs expected
David Deeter + Mark Deeter2648% games−1.4% vs expected
Christian Manchester + Carl Parker2743% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Spencer + Orlando Dangond1535% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Spencer + Carl Parker1433% gamesnot enough data
Mamie Manchester + Monica Lozano224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roger Lee
57W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kristin Hofer
110W–99L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Camden Spencer
42W–28L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Tim Hofer
33W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Emma Parker
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ivana Urbanowski
79W–73L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carol Duber
61W–39L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
David Deeter
27W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dina Fisher
56W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carl Parker
67W–97L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Christian Manchester
31W–73L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Mamie Manchester
93W–93L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Betsey Poe
46W–72L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Dawn Kohn
54W–74L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
Monica Lozano
30W–59L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37
Jeffrey Spencer
15W–56L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.31
Adam Kohn
7W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Carroll
47W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Deeter
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Carroll
7W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Parker
6W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Orlando Dangond
16W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.