Teams

F 3.0S/6.0D CC2 Lombardo

2023 NEOTA Fusion · NEOTA 3.0S

17 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA 3.0S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1F 3.0S/6.0D MV2 Ung81341126261
2F 3.0S/6.0D LT Savelieff81301540337
3F 3.0S/6.0D CC1 Dixon72281735320
4F 3.0S/6.0D PM Whitlam54261942339
5F 3.0S/6.0D MV1 Beebe45212452401
6F 3.0S/6.0D FRR McNamara45202552390
7F 3.0S/6.0D CV Carroll45202554375
8F 3.0S/6.0D PW Merugu36202554413
9F 3.0S/6.0D CC2 Lombardo27153064442
10F 3.0S/6.0D TP Licari09113471461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Brooke Garson
published 4
3.38
Venkatraman Arakoni
published
3.11
Nancy Sobecks
published
3.09
Haley Jividen
published 3.5
3.05
Sara Schaefer
published
3.04
Amalia Stoica
published 3
2.99
Alamelu Arakoni
published 3
2.98
Bridgette Palus
published 3.5
2.92
Stephanie Kevany
published
2.91
Jess Pleasant
published
2.91
Joe Bocanegra
published
2.88
Marko Savic
published
Beth Wotawa
published 3
2.73
David Lombardo
published 3
2.66
Ann Cleminson
published 3
2.37
Bonnie Thiel
published 3
VICKI PARKER
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Palus + Brooke Garson5076% games+24.6% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Bridgette Palus5076% games+11.8% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Amalia Stoica191155% games+5.1% vs expected
Sara Schaefer + Bridgette Palus6261% gamesnot enough data
Sara Schaefer + Haley Jividen4254% gamesnot enough data
Beth Wotawa + Alamelu Arakoni3248% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Kevany + Jess Pleasant404 matchesnot enough data
Beth Wotawa + Amalia Stoica213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Garson
68W–34L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Venkatraman Arakoni
83W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Nancy Sobecks
46W–99L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Haley Jividen
51W–27L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sara Schaefer
49W–39L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Amalia Stoica
122W–95L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Alamelu Arakoni
134W–84L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Bridgette Palus
44W–30L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Stephanie Kevany
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jess Pleasant
40W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
Joe Bocanegra
19W–28L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
Marko Savic
10W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Beth Wotawa
34W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
David Lombardo
30W–70L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ann Cleminson
39W–32L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Bonnie Thiel
12W–22L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37
VICKI PARKER
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.