Teams

CM BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs SKY REDLost 01
L#2 SinglesPatrick Kehoe vs Tom Parnell1-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs CACM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesGordon Smith / Paul Tighe vs Brad Webb / Michael Thebeau4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Goetz / Patrick Kehoe vs Jack Tighe / Eric Marquez0-6, 1-6
2023-05-15vs GAC BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesPaul Tighe / David Goetz vs Sven Collins / John Adam Killian6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesPatrick Kehoe vs Stephen Parmentier3-6, 0-6
2023-05-08vs EM ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Tighe / Patrick Kehoe vs Luke Hanna / Michael Kaag1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-01vs WP-G NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonald Brandes / Patrick Kehoe vs Jarrid DeMaio / Guy LaRosa2-6, 1-6
2023-04-24vs SKY REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesPatrick Kehoe vs Bentley Hodges2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Olson / Paul Tighe vs Merle Atkinson / Chris Murphy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-17vs CACM REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesDavid Goetz / Paul Tighe vs Jack Tighe / Dennis Thebeau6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPatrick Kehoe vs Brad Webb4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Steven Tamez
published
3.17
Andrew Kop
published 3
3.00
David Goetz
published 3
2.99
Patrick Kehoe
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.98
Nils Holum
published
2.92
Paul Tighe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Gordon Smith
published
Chad Olson
published 3
Philippe Becquet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Kehoe + Gordon Smith6163% games+6.5% vs expected
David Goetz + Patrick Kehoe314 matchesnot enough data
David Goetz + Gordon Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Tighe + Patrick Kehoe213 matchesnot enough data
Gordon Smith + Philippe Becquet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Tamez
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3
Andrew Kop
28W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
David Goetz
42W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Patrick Kehoe
43W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Nils Holum
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Paul Tighe
60W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
2.92
Gordon Smith
29W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Chad Olson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Philippe Becquet
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.