Teams

GAC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs WP-G NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Raemer / John Adam Killian vs Talwin Filholm / Ndudi Oparaeche0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLon Robbins / Ben Dannenberg vs Guy LaRosa / Jarrid DeMaio2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Steve Kazemi6-1, 6-3
2023-05-22vs SKY REDLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Tom Parnell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLon Robbins / Ben Dannenberg vs Mike Turman / Andrew Sarka4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrian Raemer vs Bentley Hodges2-6, 2-6
2023-05-15vs CM BLUEWon 10
W#2 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Patrick Kehoe6-3, 6-0
2023-05-08vs CACM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Raemer / Todd Beagle vs Philip Sullivan / Jack Tighe5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLon Robbins vs Tom Peters6-3, 6-3
2023-05-01vs EM ORANGEWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs David Jensen6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Raemer vs Luke Hanna6-4, 6-3
2023-04-24vs WP-G NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesLon Robbins / Stephen Parmentier vs Talwin Filholm / Ndudi Oparaeche2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-17vs SKY REDWon 30
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Steve Ferris6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLon Robbins / Jim Lord vs David Mathias / Mike Turman7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrian Raemer vs Matt MacLachlan6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Stephen Parmentier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.20
Ben Dannenberg
published 3.5
3.14
Eric Edwards
published
3.02
John Adam Killian
published
3.01
Jason Wagner
published
3.01
Jim Lord
published
3.00
Brian Raemer
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.85
Lon Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Michael Barry
published
Todd Beagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Wagner + Lon Robbins314 matchesnot enough data
Eric Edwards + Jim Lord314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Wagner + John Adam Killian303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephen Parmentier
91W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
3.5
Ben Dannenberg
24W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Eric Edwards
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
John Adam Killian
29W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.02
Jason Wagner
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jim Lord
35W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Brian Raemer
46W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Lon Robbins
49W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.85
Michael Barry
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Beagle
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.