Teams

CSCC TAFOLLA

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs LTFCS HILTBRANDWon 31
W#1 DoublesPatrice Tafolla / Sutton Spanton vs Lisa Ostly / Dana Kennedy6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTrudi Jackson vs Amy Sauerland6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Miller / Peggy Kimsey vs Deena Hiltbrand / Jane Glimco0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGloria Carpenter / Paula Hanson vs Linda Olson / Annamarie Brachfeld6-4, 7-6
2024-07-08vs CSRC POULINLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Hanson / Patrice Tafolla vs Claire Sneed / Alicia Stier1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPeggy Kimsey / Colleen Miller vs Karen Newton / Anne Hiles1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Evilsizer / Jacqueline Skaggs vs Shawnee Brenner / Patricia Poulin4-6, 2-6
2024-07-01vs CCOC SUNGWon 30
W#1 DoublesSutton Spanton / Erin Rhodes vs Marishah Erickson / Irene Larimer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Evilsizer / Patrice Tafolla vs Joy Rubley / Johane Aertker6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGloria Carpenter / Colleen Miller vs Trudy Wells / Sarah Blamires6-4, 6-2
2024-06-24vs FLYHS BARTHELMESLost 12
L#1 DoublesSutton Spanton / Patrice Tafolla vs Kristy Pring / Tisha Hickerson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGloria Carpenter / Paula Hanson vs Joy Barthelmes / Julie Maegdlin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeggy Kimsey / Colleen Miller vs Michele Noonan / Denny Elston6-2, 6-0
2024-06-17vs CCW TOSTANOSKISplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatrice Tafolla / Erin Rhodes vs Stacy Mills / Margaret Hill4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTrudi Jackson vs Karen Shuman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Hanson / Sutton Spanton vs Jeanne Osborn / Debra Short6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesColleen Miller / Peggy Kimsey vs Callie Scott / Millicent Geers6-4, 6-3
2024-06-10vs LTFCS HILTBRANDLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Rhodes / Sutton Spanton vs Lisa Ostly / Ivy Liu6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Hanson / Trudi Jackson vs Susan Shaink / Deena Hiltbrand5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Skaggs / Diane Wilborn vs Jenn Hull / Sarah Lueckeman1-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs CSRC POULINWon 31
W#1 DoublesErin Rhodes / Sutton Spanton vs Karen Newton / Patricia Poulin6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTrudi Jackson vs Alicia Stier7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPaula Hanson / Colleen Miller vs Noel Kelly / Anne Hiles3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Davis / Diane Wilborn vs Shawnee Brenner / Kristina Kyle6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Sutton Spanton
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.87
Trudi Jackson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Mary Evilsizer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gloria Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Jacqueline Skaggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Diane Wilborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patrice Tafolla
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Paula Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Peggy Kimsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Kimsey + Gloria Carpenter5453% games+5.9% vs expected
Jacqueline Skaggs + Trudi Jackson3351% games+3.2% vs expected
Patrice Tafolla + Sutton Spanton6258% games+3.0% vs expected
Paula Hanson + Patrice Tafolla2638% games−4.6% vs expected
Diane Wilborn + Jacqueline Skaggs1634% games−15.2% vs expected
Paula Hanson + Gloria Carpenter3253% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Kimsey + Diane Wilborn1440% gamesnot enough data
Paula Hanson + Jacqueline Skaggs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sutton Spanton
99W–63L career · 6 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
Trudi Jackson
26W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.87
Mary Evilsizer
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Gloria Carpenter
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jacqueline Skaggs
19W–42L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Diane Wilborn
14W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.32
Patrice Tafolla
26W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Hanson
17W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Kimsey
14W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.