Teams

LTFCS HILTBRAND

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.05 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs CSCC TAFOLLALost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Ostly / Dana Kennedy vs Patrice Tafolla / Sutton Spanton3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Trudi Jackson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDeena Hiltbrand / Jane Glimco vs Colleen Miller / Peggy Kimsey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Olson / Annamarie Brachfeld vs Gloria Carpenter / Paula Hanson4-6, 6-7
2024-07-08vs FLYHS BARTHELMESSplit 22
W#1 DoublesIvy Liu / Jenn Hull vs Melissa Biewenga / Michele Noonan6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Kristy Pring6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDana Kennedy / Sarah Lueckeman vs Karla Balk / Reagan Lenhart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Olson / Annamarie Brachfeld vs Joy Barthelmes / Lea List5-7, 6-7
2024-07-01vs CCW TOSTANOSKIWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrenda Herzinger / Lisa Ostly vs Margaret Hill / Stacy Mills6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesIsabel Swenson vs Callie Scott6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDana Kennedy / Jane Glimco vs Debra Short / Mary Tostanoski6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenn Hull / Susan Shaink vs Jeanne Osborn / Millicent Geers6-0, 6-0
2024-06-24vs CCOC SUNGWon 40
W#1 DoublesIvy Liu / Susan Shaink vs Irene Larimer / Johane Aertker6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIsabel Swenson vs Pamella Dickey6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Lueckeman / Jane Glimco vs R Abigail Yapor / Cynthia Lund6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Herzinger / Deena Hiltbrand vs Trudy Wells / Sarah Blamires6-0, 6-1
2024-06-17vs CSRC POULINSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrenda Herzinger / Deena Hiltbrand vs Noel Kelly / Alicia Stier6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Jinda Booth3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJenn Hull / Jane Glimco vs Karen Newton / Kristina Kyle6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnnamarie Brachfeld / Lisa Ostly vs Shawnee Brenner / Denielle Backstrom1-6, 1-6
2024-06-10vs CSCC TAFOLLAWon 31
L#1 DoublesLisa Ostly / Ivy Liu vs Erin Rhodes / Sutton Spanton3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Julie Davis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaink / Deena Hiltbrand vs Paula Hanson / Trudi Jackson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenn Hull / Sarah Lueckeman vs Jacqueline Skaggs / Diane Wilborn6-1, 6-3
2024-06-03vs FLYHS BARTHELMESWon 31
L#1 DoublesJane Glimco / Isabel Swenson vs Alice Bauder / Reagan Lenhart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Marilyn McGee6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Kennedy / Sarah Lueckeman vs Denny Elston / Julie Maegdlin6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Shaink / Jenn Hull vs Tisha Hickerson / Andrea Murray6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brenda Herzinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jenn Hull
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.98
Jane Glimco
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.97
Susan Shaink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Amy Sauerland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.88
Lisa Ostly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Dana Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ivy Liu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Isabel Swenson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Deena Hiltbrand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Annamarie Brachfeld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Lueckeman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ostly + Jane Glimco15468% games+15.6% vs expected
Jane Glimco + Sarah Lueckeman3257% games+13.0% vs expected
Amy Sauerland + Lisa Ostly8363% games+8.2% vs expected
Jane Glimco + Susan Shaink29863% games+7.0% vs expected
Dana Kennedy + Sarah Lueckeman13459% games+5.2% vs expected
Lisa Ostly + Jenn Hull5260% games−2.1% vs expected
Lisa Ostly + Susan Shaink5452% games−4.8% vs expected
Amy Sauerland + Jane Glimco5162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Herzinger
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jenn Hull
78W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Jane Glimco
97W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Amy Sauerland
57W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Lisa Ostly
123W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dana Kennedy
58W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ivy Liu
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Isabel Swenson
34W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Deena Hiltbrand
36W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Annamarie Brachfeld
5W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Sarah Lueckeman
30W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.