Teams

IN/Denton/X18&Over10.0

Spring USTA Central Indiana Mixed 18 & Over 10.0 · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 10.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-29vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP HullettLost 12
W#1 DoublesLucy Loy / Michael Scanlon vs Natalia De Ugarte Munoz / Desmond Wah6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKiersten Carlson / Matthew Moody vs Gabrielle Rubenstein / Miguel Flores4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMadelyn Bond / Marius Schmitt vs Krystal Grubb / Tyler Hornback3-6, 6-7
2026-05-17vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP BurkhardtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Denton / Claire Reifeis vs Connor Dunn / Elizaveta Kleber6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Chader / Catherine Miller vs Kris Looney / Nicola Frazer6-3, 6-1
2026-05-15vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP BurkhardtWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Claire Reifeis vs Andrea Burkhardt / Noah Stern7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKiersten Carlson / David Chader vs Nick Reinhart / Elizaveta Kleber6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLucy Loy / Colin Atkinson vs Connor Dunn / Nicola Frazer6-2, 6-3
2026-05-08vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP HullettWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Chader / Danielle Haefele vs Abbey Neff / Desmond Wah6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Bond / Michael Scanlon vs Krystal Grubb / Trevor Cox6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Miller / Matthew Moody vs Shelby Hullett / Tyler Hornback6-2, 7-6
2026-04-24vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP BurkhardtWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Miller / Marius Schmitt vs Nikhil Kulkarni / Elizaveta Kleber2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Chader / Danielle Haefele vs Veronika Bruetting / Nick Reinhart6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Bond / Michael Scanlon vs Andrea Burkhardt / Carlos Noriega6-2, 6-3
2026-04-17vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP HullettWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Chader / Claire Reifeis vs Gabrielle Rubenstein / Richard Ritter6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Denton / Lucy Loy vs Abbey Neff / Miguel Flores6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Miller / Marius Schmitt vs Brandon Lew / Emily Thompson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-27vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP BurkhardtSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Catherine Miller vs Veronika Bruetting / Connor Dunn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Chader / Madelyn Bond vs Tom Ciszewski / Katrina Berban5-7, 2-6
2026-03-20vs Indy X18 10.0 IHP HullettWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Catherine Miller vs Miguel Flores / Krystal Grubb6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Chader / Danielle Haefele vs Shelby Hullett / Brandon Lew6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Moody / Claire Reifeis vs Tyler Hornback / Natalia De Ugarte Munoz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 10.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN/Denton/X18&Over10.06216819187
2Indy X18 10.0 IHP Hullett44111330229
3Indy X18 10.0 IHP Burkhardt2691534244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.99
Claire Reifeis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.82
Jason Denton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.74
David Chader
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.69
Michael Scanlon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.56
Marius Schmitt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.47
Madelyn Bond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.43
Matthew Moody
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.36
Kiersten Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Danielle Haefele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Colin Atkinson
published 4.5
4.13
Lucy Loy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Reifeis + Jason Denton5261% gamesnot enough data
Madelyn Bond + Jason Denton213 matchesnot enough data
David Chader + Danielle Haefele303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claire Reifeis
41W–8L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
4.99
Jason Denton
130W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.82
5
David Chader
225W–48L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.74
Michael Scanlon
74W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
Marius Schmitt
75W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.56
Madelyn Bond
58W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
Matthew Moody
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.43
Kiersten Carlson
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.36
4.5
Danielle Haefele
30W–25L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Colin Atkinson
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucy Loy
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.