Teams

Hilliard 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-08vs Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 20
W#2 DoublesStephen Davis / J Stacey Allred vs Kevin Redding / Art Fadde7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Hanger / Huy Ho vs Jeff Reichard / Glenn Vainwright6-3, 6-3
2026-03-25vs Jackson 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJagdeep Singh / Eric Lustig vs Todd Hurst / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Williams / Ryan Hilliard vs Anthony Jackson / Kevin Navarro6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Apple / Michael Raley vs Kevin Hulse / David Rachels6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Eric Lustig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Chris Apple
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Huy Ho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
J Stacey Allred
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Michael Raley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Ryan Hilliard
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Chris Hanger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Robert Davis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.41
Anthony Bangay
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Cal Kimrey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Wade Legette
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Bangay + Ryan Hilliard7357% games+5.2% vs expected
Chris Hanger + Huy Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Lustig
9W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Chris Apple
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Huy Ho
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
J Stacey Allred
12W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Michael Raley
30W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Ryan Hilliard
40W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Chris Hanger
31W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Robert Davis
42W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Anthony Bangay
39W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cal Kimrey
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Wade Legette
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.