Teams

Team 12

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Gelbman / Sarah Baker vs Kevin Dalzell / Kaori McFarland3-6, 5-2
2022-03-06vs Team 10 Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Gelbman / Sarah Baker vs Jared Sharp / Jennifer Hanna6-1, 6-1
2022-02-20vs Team 4 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Baker / Scott Gelbman vs Carol Druzbick / Thoufiq Kaleemullah6-3, 3-4
2022-02-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Gelbman / Suzanne Swanhorst vs Rahul Sharma / Jelena Sypher6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Scott Gelbman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Gilles Marchand
published 4
3.96
Manish Desai
published
3.92
3.75
VIjay Chari
published
3.65
Tom Oda
published
3.64
Sharon Marczewski
published
3.54
3.46
Glen Medina
published 4
3.44
Cheryl Hughes
published 3.5
3.42
Lesley Wellener
published
Elisabeth Barrand
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Marczewski + Gilles Marchand211851% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Scott Gelbman
73W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Gilles Marchand
55W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.03
Manish Desai
28W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Alexandra Phillips
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
VIjay Chari
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Tom Oda
60W–69L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Sharon Marczewski
53W–43L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Muthukrishnan Ganesan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Glen Medina
84W–132L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Cheryl Hughes
26W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Lesley Wellener
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Elisabeth Barrand
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Premkumar Chindepalli
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.