Teams

Team 10 Triple Threat

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesErin Gorman / Jared Sharp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06vs Team 12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Ottenheimer / June Wheatley vs Gilles Marchand / Sharon Marczewski2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-26vs Team 2 SpoilersLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicholas Bennett / Erin Gorman vs Mike Burgoyne / Candice Rininger1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-19vs Team 6 Over ServedLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Gorvett / Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti vs Cara Holtmann / Ryan Rohn0-6, 2-6
2022-01-30vs Team 11 Double the FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicholas Bennett / June Wheatley vs Bob White / Tracey White6-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesEric Ottenheimer / Erin Gorman vs Alan Ogilvie / Kimberlee Overdeck6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Gorvett / Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti vs Brendy Hantzes / Scott Gorvett1-6, 2-6
2022-01-23vs Team 3 Can't Ace This.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Ottenheimer / June Wheatley vs Luis Lozano / Sharon Sabasteanski2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-17vs Team 4 Wise Ace GOATsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatalina Tafur / Jared Sharp vs Lindsey Keeler / Jonathan Kim0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Nathan Leslie
published
Gianna Kang
published 4.5
3.94
Catalina Tafur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
June Wheatley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Eric Ottenheimer
published 4
3.81
Mark Matsko
published
3.71
Erin Gorman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Deann Zoghlin
published 4
3.48
Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Andrea Hickman
published 3.5
3.10
Mark Meleski
published
Jennifer Hanna
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Leslie
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Gianna Kang
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Catalina Tafur
114W–169L career · 1 line in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
June Wheatley
122W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Eric Ottenheimer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Erin Gorman
87W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Deann Zoghlin
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti
78W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Andrea Hickman
46W–55L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mark Meleski
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Hanna
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.