Teams

V - Sunset Hills

2022 USTA Mixed 18 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Bandy / Thanh Nguyen vs Scott Adams / Emily Werman6-4, 6-4
2022-02-20Split 11
L#1 DoublesIvette Dunlop / Michael Mani vs Katie Callaghan-Diaz / Kevin Jiang2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Harlow / Thanh Nguyen vs Mark Sauer / Danyiel Callaghan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-30vs V - LLW-Las Posas CC-B WakatsukiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Mani / Monica Bandy vs Angela McCampbell / Mark McCampbell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPat Johnson / Michelle Harlow vs Danyiel Callaghan / Kevin Jiang5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSonny Romero / Nichole Munro vs Katie Callaghan-Diaz / Lance Nelson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-23vs V - Mission PossiblesLost 01
L#2 DoublesIvette Dunlop / Pat Johnson vs Kristina McKee / John Valdez6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-01-09vs V - LLW-Las Posas CC-B WakatsukiLost 01
L#1 DoublesPat Johnson / Ivette Dunlop vs Mark McCampbell / Angela McCampbell2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Ivette Dunlop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Monica Bandy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Grace Perez
published 4.5
4.06
Sonny Romero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Michael Mani
published
4.02
Michelle Harlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Pat Johnson
published
3.74
Darryl Heller
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ivette Dunlop + Sonny Romero4157% gamesnot enough data
Ivette Dunlop + Michael Mani134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ivette Dunlop
130W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Monica Bandy
75W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Grace Perez
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Sonny Romero
34W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
Michael Mani
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Michelle Harlow
93W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Pat Johnson
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Darryl Heller
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.