Teams

TOC.DeFusco

2025 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs MD.CurtisWon 50
W#1 DoublesVinay Chandra / Christopher DeFusco vs Grayson Hale / Kevin Lee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSantosh Kumar Saidapur vs Jay Moreau6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Mize / Jeff Rauber vs Brian Tanaka / Bobby Rawls6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDan Zhu / Will Lennon vs Mark McCormick / Marcello Giulianotti1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#4 DoublesGary Bossert / Rustin Bourbeau vs James Hart / King Bostrom6-4, 7-5
2025-03-09vs MD.CurtisLost 13
L#1 DoublesGary Bossert / Will Lennon vs Brian Tanaka / Kevin Lee6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSantosh Kumar Saidapur / Jeff Rauber vs Chris Curtis / Anand Lakshmanan4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVinay Chandra / David Mize vs David Zies / Matt Wright6-3, 6-3
L#4 DoublesRodger Young / Jeff Newton vs Bobby Rawls / Marcello Giulianotti2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
David Mize
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Justin Waychoff
published
3.06
Jeff Rauber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Dan Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Vinay Chandra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Santosh Kumar Saidapur
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Will Lennon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Robert Long
published
Christopher DeFusco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gary Bossert
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jeff Newton
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Rodger Young
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Rustin Bourbeau
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Mize
40W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Justin Waychoff
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jeff Rauber
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Dan Zhu
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Vinay Chandra
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Santosh Kumar Saidapur
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Will Lennon
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christopher DeFusco
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gary Bossert
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Newton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rodger Young
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rustin Bourbeau
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.