Teams

MD.Curtis

2025 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs TOC.DeFuscoLost 05
L#1 DoublesGrayson Hale / Kevin Lee vs Vinay Chandra / Christopher DeFusco6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJay Moreau vs Santosh Kumar Saidapur0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Tanaka / Bobby Rawls vs David Mize / Jeff Rauber2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMark McCormick / Marcello Giulianotti vs Dan Zhu / Will Lennon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJames Hart / King Bostrom vs Gary Bossert / Rustin Bourbeau4-6, 5-7
2025-03-09vs TOC.DeFuscoWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Tanaka / Kevin Lee vs Gary Bossert / Will Lennon7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Curtis / Anand Lakshmanan vs Santosh Kumar Saidapur / Jeff Rauber6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Zies / Matt Wright vs Vinay Chandra / David Mize3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesBobby Rawls / Marcello Giulianotti vs Rodger Young / Jeff Newton6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Grayson Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
David Zies
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Anand Lakshmanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Mark McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Bobby Rawls
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Marcello Giulianotti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Brian Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
King Bostrom
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Robert Wiltberger
published
Jay Moreau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grayson Hale
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
David Zies
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anand Lakshmanan
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mark McCormick
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Bobby Rawls
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Marcello Giulianotti
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Brian Tanaka
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
King Bostrom
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Robert Wiltberger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jay Moreau
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.