Teams

Selman 3.5

2023 Adult 18&Over-PB · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Makenzie Woodward
published
Alison Chandler
published 3.5
3.25
Renee Dozier
published
3.19
Brandi Harper
published 3.5
3.15
Robin Hudson
published
3.12
Paige Hutchinson
published
3.10
Annette Foreman
published 3.5
3.07
Regan Rhian Parker
published
2.80
Mindi Selman
published
2.74
Hollie Parker
published
2.73
Beth Rayborn
published 3.5
Melissa Mitchell
published
Shannon Pigott
published
Tessa Bledsoe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Rayborn + Robin Hudson2352% games−3.3% vs expected
Annette Foreman + Hollie Parker3255% gamesnot enough data
Regan Rhian Parker + Beth Rayborn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Cannada Rush
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Makenzie Woodward
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Alison Chandler
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Dozier
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.25
3.5
Brandi Harper
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Robin Hudson
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
Paige Hutchinson
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Annette Foreman
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Regan Rhian Parker
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Mindi Selman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.80
Hollie Parker
53W–33L career · no lines in 2023
0%4%96%
2.74
3.5
Beth Rayborn
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.73
Melissa Mitchell
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Pigott
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tessa Bledsoe
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.