Teams

SGV HFA -Salas-Downey High School/SA9

2025 Mixed Doubles - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-01vs SGV Arcadia Allies-Li--Arcadia-SU1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Sebastian Perez vs Su Li / Changlin Wu7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGiovanni Leguizamon / Lisa Santana vs Julia Arnold / Jeff Bernstein3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesSergio Salas / Adriana Higuera vs Kirby Xu / Xintong Tan6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSebastian Perez / Ariana Garcia vs Su Li / Xiao Zhang4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVanessa Vanda / Nicolas Velazco vs Changlin Wu / Barb Vetterick6-1, 7-6
L#1 DoublesSergio Salas / Corinda Hayes vs Kirby Xu / Xintong Tan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdriana Higuera / Calvin Maniago vs Barb Vetterick / Changlin Wu6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSebastian Perez / Vanessa Vanda vs Jeff Bernstein / Julia Arnold6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 6.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Nicolas Velazco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Paula Quesada
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.24
Adriana Higuera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Ariana Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Sergio Salas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Giovanni Leguizamon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Vanessa Vanda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Megumi Kodama
published
2.74
Calvin Maniago
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Lisa Santana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Richard Alfaro
published
2.50
Corinda Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Quesada + Nicolas Velazco8258% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicolas Velazco
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Paula Quesada
17W–29L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Adriana Higuera
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Ariana Garcia
31W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
Sergio Salas
36W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Giovanni Leguizamon
23W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Vanessa Vanda
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Megumi Kodama
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Calvin Maniago
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Lisa Santana
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Richard Alfaro
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Corinda Hayes
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.