Teams

BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 40MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

23 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Jessica Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
4.15
Jamille Lee
published 4.5
3.99
Vikram Kadi
published
3.94
Angela Merola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Albert Acosta
published 4
3.86
Dawn Schlagel
published 4
3.86
Flor Salinas
published 4
3.83
Mika Tsuchiiwa
published
3.83
Gary Gem Yanez
published 4
3.81
Dennis Ciriaco
published 4
3.79
Ariane Sanders
published 4
3.77
Maxwell Njelita
published
3.62
Raquel Barrera
published
3.52
3.44
Diana Babayan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Melvin San Pedro
published
3.35
Rebecca Kay
published
3.33
Chris Dao
published 3.5
Jay Magsano
published
Marie Anne Tabtab
published
Ray Ramos
published
Ronald Tabtab
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Barrera + Gary Gem Yanez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Kim
31W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Frederick Crescencio
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Jamille Lee
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
4.15
Vikram Kadi
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Angela Merola
43W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Albert Acosta
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Dawn Schlagel
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Flor Salinas
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Mika Tsuchiiwa
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.83
4
Gary Gem Yanez
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Dennis Ciriaco
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ariane Sanders
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Maxwell Njelita
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Raquel Barrera
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Hunter Hollingsworth
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Melvin San Pedro
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Chris Dao
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Jay Magsano
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Anne Tabtab
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ray Ramos
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Tabtab
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.