Teams

Stoupa

2024 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-23vs NE/Erwin/Redding/40&Over8.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephan Andersen / Nicole Carmine vs Scott Lilleskov / Jennifer Allison0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Hinrichs / Julie Obear vs Daniel Reid / Julia Elkin6-0, 6-1
2024-02-16vs ThomasLost 12
L#1 DoublesThad Fineran / Kari Stempson vs Stephanie Johnson / Brigham van Auken4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Orr / Barbara Scribner vs Angeline Larson / James Merrill0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Hinrichs / Julie Obear vs Jonna Pester / Myron Sikora6-3, 6-1
2024-02-09vs TeglerWon 10
W#1 DoublesThad Fineran / Nicole Carmine vs Scott Porath / Jodi Nelson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-02vs BlumelWon 20
W#2 DoublesKari Stempson / Thad Fineran vs Kimberly Gradoville / Dale Dixon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNelle Jamison / Rick Stempson vs Anne Heard / Stephen Collins6-4, 6-1
2024-01-26vs BourlandLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephan Andersen / Nicole Carmine vs Richard Crossley / Brandi Goldapp6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Milburn / Julie Obear vs Debra Adams / Ross Jensen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Scribner / Mark Orr vs Tami Bourland / Andy Wang1-6, 6-7
2024-01-19vs TongSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRick Stempson / Nelle Jamison vs Anastasia Kyvelidou / Ying Zhang2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Milburn / Herita Akamah vs Karen Andresen / Paras Bedmutha6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Erwin/Redding/40&Over8.0MXD601536103
2Thomas429922175
3Stoupa236918128
4Blumel2481022162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Julie Obear
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Herita Akamah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Rick Stempson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.64
David Stoupa
published 4
3.61
Kari Stempson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Stephan Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Nelle Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Nicole Carmine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Barbara Scribner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mark Hinrichs
published
Thad Fineran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Milburn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Stempson + Nelle Jamison6259% games+22.7% vs expected
Julie Obear + Stephan Andersen8264% games+12.2% vs expected
Nicole Carmine + Stephan Andersen10655% games+4.1% vs expected
Rick Stempson + Julie Obear3451% gamesnot enough data
Rick Stempson + Kari Stempson3250% gamesnot enough data
Herita Akamah + Thad Fineran3253% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Carmine + David Stoupa3254% gamesnot enough data
Kari Stempson + Thad Fineran123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Obear
99W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.84
Herita Akamah
87W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Rick Stempson
69W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
4
David Stoupa
44W–43L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Kari Stempson
74W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Stephan Andersen
138W–107L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Nelle Jamison
46W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Nicole Carmine
125W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Scribner
58W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.81
Mark Hinrichs
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thad Fineran
85W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Milburn
29W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.