Teams

NE/Erwin/Redding/40&Over8.0MXD

2024 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-01vs TongWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Reid / Melissa Gonzalez vs Christian Cortinas / Wei Tong6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Neese / Molly Hunt-Spisak vs Adam Studts / Amy Studts6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesScott Lilleskov / Cathy Fluckey vs Ying Zhang / Anastasia Kyvelidou6-2, 6-1
2024-02-23vs StoupaWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Lilleskov / Jennifer Allison vs Stephan Andersen / Nicole Carmine6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Reid / Julia Elkin vs Mark Hinrichs / Julie Obear0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChris Foster / Lori Schmaderer vs Erik Johnson / Nancy Johnson7-5, 7-5
2024-02-09vs ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenn Smith / Daniel Reid vs Stephen Thomas / Jennifer Lindner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChris Foster / Molly Hunt-Spisak vs James Merrill / Jonna Pester6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrittni Redding / Scott Lilleskov vs Jolene Johnson / Scott Adams6-1, 6-4
2024-02-02vs TeglerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Allison / Scott Lilleskov vs George Nelson / Stacy Pickering6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrittni Redding / Adam Gouttierre vs Scott Porath / Jodi Nelson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Reid / Melissa Gonzalez vs Shannon Brinkman / Ryan Johnson6-1, 6-1
2024-01-26vs BlumelWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Engel / Cathy Fluckey vs Elizabeth Flood / Jeff Fredricks6-7, 1-4
W#2 DoublesMolly Hunt-Spisak / David Neese vs Brian Beene / Heather Blumel6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Gouttierre / Brittni Redding vs Dale Dixon / Kimberly Gradoville6-1, 6-2
2024-01-19vs BourlandWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Neese / Molly Hunt-Spisak vs Mike Gardner / Andrea Jensen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenn Smith / Daniel Reid vs Richard Crossley / Brandi Goldapp6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Allison / Scott Lilleskov vs Ross Jensen / Jenny Waltemath6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Erwin/Redding/40&Over8.0MXD601536103
2Thomas429922175
3Stoupa236918128
4Blumel2481022162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Jennifer Allison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
4.35
Brittni Redding
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
David Neese
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Molly Hunt-Spisak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Scott Lilleskov
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.85
Cathy Fluckey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Adam Gouttierre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Julia Elkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Jenn Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Joe Engel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Daniel Reid
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.30
Lori Schmaderer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittni Redding + Adam Gouttierre7168% games+13.4% vs expected
David Neese + Molly Hunt-Spisak7164% games+11.8% vs expected
Molly Hunt-Spisak + Adam Gouttierre6267% games+8.5% vs expected
Lori Schmaderer + Scott Lilleskov4557% games+5.8% vs expected
David Neese + Jennifer Allison8163% games+4.6% vs expected
Jenn Smith + Scott Lilleskov4160% gamesnot enough data
Brittni Redding + Scott Lilleskov4165% gamesnot enough data
Jenn Smith + Joe Engel404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Allison
160W–50L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Brittni Redding
123W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
David Neese
144W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
Molly Hunt-Spisak
102W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Scott Lilleskov
58W–24L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Cathy Fluckey
65W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Adam Gouttierre
77W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
Julia Elkin
87W–62L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
Jenn Smith
73W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Joe Engel
43W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Daniel Reid
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
Lori Schmaderer
84W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Melissa Gonzalez
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.