Teams

CACM RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-28vs CP BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdward Budd / David Marks vs Zach VanCamp / Cole Anthony6-2, 6-1
2025-05-12vs CM BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Hoy / Edward Budd vs Mark Fulford / John Hutchison7-6, 7-5
2025-05-05vs WP-C GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Edward Budd vs Alex Magana / Carlos Estrada6-1, 6-0
2025-04-28vs WP-G BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Budd / David Marks vs Jarrid DeMaio / Karl Werenskjold2-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs APR-U BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Budd / David Marks vs Brian Dutzar / Andrew Horning6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
James Bach
published 3.5
3.06
Brad Webb
published 3
3.05
Michael Vieau
published
3.05
Griff Jones
published 3
2.95
Tom Peters
published
2.88
Edward Budd
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Dan Avery
published 3
2.84
Jim Gordon
published
2.80
John Molina
published
2.78
James Hoy
published 3
2.66
Paul Chandler
published
2.58
John White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Budd + Paul Chandler6261% games+15.1% vs expected
Brad Webb + Paul Chandler3353% games+12.6% vs expected
Brad Webb + Jim Gordon4165% games+8.4% vs expected
Brad Webb + James Hoy6655% games+5.2% vs expected
John Molina + John White1441% games+1.0% vs expected
James Hoy + Edward Budd4251% games−9.3% vs expected
Dan Avery + Jim Gordon314 matchesnot enough data
Edward Budd + Tom Peters404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Bach
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Brad Webb
54W–61L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Michael Vieau
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Griff Jones
41W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Tom Peters
36W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Edward Budd
90W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Dan Avery
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jim Gordon
42W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
John Molina
16W–34L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
James Hoy
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Paul Chandler
36W–42L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
John White
9W–35L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.