Teams

CM BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-19vs CM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Kluck / Nils Holum vs David Milliken / Brent Levy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-12vs CACM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Kluck / David Krutsinger vs Brad Webb / James Bach2-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs DTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Kluck / David Krutsinger vs Chris Curwen / Craig Johnson3-6, 3-6
2025-04-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Kluck / David Krutsinger vs John Thompson / Ben Kelly6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs WP-C GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesDavid Krutsinger / David Goetz vs Ryan Archibald / John Orsak6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDave Colodny vs Carlos Estrada4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Hutchison / Kevin Fitzpatrick vs Mark Kunkel / Alex Magana6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMark Fulford vs Sy Sussman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSeth Belzley / Matt Teitelbaum vs Kyle Fritsch / Scott Meyer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
David Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Nils Holum
published
2.85
Dave Colodny
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Matt Teitelbaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chad Olson
published 3
2.75
Kevin Fitzpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
David Krutsinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Mark Fulford
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Paul Kluck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
John Hutchison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Philippe Becquet
published
Seth Belzley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Krutsinger + David Goetz3347% gamesnot enough data
David Krutsinger + Kevin Fitzpatrick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Goetz
42W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Nils Holum
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Dave Colodny
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Matt Teitelbaum
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Chad Olson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Fitzpatrick
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
David Krutsinger
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mark Fulford
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Paul Kluck
32W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
John Hutchison
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Philippe Becquet
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Seth Belzley
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.