Teams

Fiddlesticks - Weisenger

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 X

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-15vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Sheri Posluszny / Carl Posluszny6-0, 6-2
2025-03-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Ian Campbell / Susan Miller6-1, 6-3
2025-02-15vs Gateway - SarafianLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Tom Rizzo / Michelle Koeppel4-6, 6-7
2025-02-08vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Nancy Horne / Frank Grano7-6, 6-3
2025-02-01vs Vivante - VoylesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Weisinger / Jodi Hynes vs Robert Hawken / Agnes O'Connor6-0, 6-1
2025-01-19vs Gateway - SarafianWon 10
W#2 DoublesJaime Weisinger / Jodi Hynes vs Robert Shovlin / Kirsten Shovlin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.63
Jaime Weisinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Nancy Aloia
published
3.45
Susan DelGreco
published
3.17
Lisa Lamorgese
published
3.16
Denise Weisinger
published 3.5
James Hynes
published
Jodi Hynes
published
Leandra Gain
published
Matthew Miller
published
Michael Rhodes
published
Stewart Savage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Savage + Denise Weisinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Jaime Weisinger
79W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Nancy Aloia
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Susan DelGreco
52W–53L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lisa Lamorgese
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Denise Weisinger
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
James Hynes
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Hynes
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leandra Gain
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Miller
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rhodes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stewart Savage
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.