Teams

Seminole Lakes - Domingo

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 X

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-15vs Fiddlesticks - WeisengerWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Romeo Domingo vs Susan DelGreco / Stewart Savage7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Gateway - SarafianLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Romeo Domingo vs Sonia Denoncourt / Stephen Yost4-6, 2-6
2025-01-25vs Vivante - VoylesLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Romeo Domingo vs Agnes O'Connor / Ian Campbell3-6, 3-6
2025-01-18vs Gateway - SarafianWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Keiner / Frank Grano vs David Boliver / Wendy Rowden6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesThomas Burt / Charlotte Hartman vs Susan Sarafian / Joe Scholl0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheri Posluszny / Carl Posluszny vs Yasuko Asami / Stephen Yost4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Charlotte Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Carl Posluszny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Cheryl Domingo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Sheri Posluszny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy Hysell
published 3.5
Frank Grano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Vivian
published
Lori Vivian
published
Nancy Horne
published
Pamela Keiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Romeo Domingo
published
Thomas Burt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Vivian + Gary Vivian6260% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Domingo + Romeo Domingo5258% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Posluszny + Carl Posluszny7060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Carl Posluszny
9W–8L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Cheryl Domingo
104W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Sheri Posluszny
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Hysell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Frank Grano
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gary Vivian
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Vivian
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Horne
32W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Keiner
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Romeo Domingo
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Burt
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.