Teams

Cruise/40s/3.0/BC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Amy Malloy
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Dodson
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
2.95
Alison Beebe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.84
Brittany MacMaster
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Carolyn Miller
published 3
2.70
Caroline Larussa
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Japonica Cruise
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Hodgins
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Lauren Parks
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Lindsay Fussell
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Lindsay Maxedon
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Lisa Naquin
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lori Rase
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Morgan Dore
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Olivia Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Entzel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Toni Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Rase + Toni Shepherd4349% gamesnot enough data
Brittany MacMaster + Katherine Hodgins5157% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Naquin + Lori Rase2344% gamesnot enough data
Japonica Cruise + Katherine Hodgins2345% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Parks + Lindsay Maxedon3268% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Naquin + Toni Shepherd224 matchesnot enough data
Japonica Cruise + Courtney Dodson224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hodgins + Alison Beebe224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Malloy
32W–17L career · 30 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Courtney Dodson
18W–15L career · 22 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Alison Beebe
54W–27L career · 46 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Brittany MacMaster
23W–14L career · 20 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Carolyn Miller
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Caroline Larussa
9W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Japonica Cruise
16W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
25W–18L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Parks
27W–5L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Fussell
1W–14L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Maxedon
26W–15L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Naquin
6W–21L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Rase
22W–27L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Dore
8W–21L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Simpson
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Entzel
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toni Shepherd
31W–24L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.