Teams

Harpers

2023 OH OV Spring Day A18&O W Cincinnati · 2023 Spring Day A 18&O 4.0W Cincinnati

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-24vs CamargoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanice Przezdziecki / Lisa Schwartz vs Linda Denecke / Dara Hudson6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Susan Arthur vs Katie de Alarcon / Jennifer Morgan7-5, 6-5
2023-07-17vs Queen City ChromeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerri Schantz / Janice Przezdziecki vs Donna McClanahan / Heather Tash6-1, 2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Schwartz / Laurie Trippet vs Maureen Ernst / Susan Eberlein2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Arthur / Carole Meldon vs Stephanie Besl / Paula Danis2-6, 1-6
2023-07-10vs Queen City RedLost 13
W#1 DoublesLisa Schwartz / Laurie Trippet vs Amy Ellis / Carey Hein6-7, 6-3, 2-1
L#1 SinglesMolly Tyger vs Angela Clark6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Arthur / Elizabeth Wenger vs Jenny Mayne / Connie Allen7-5, 3-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Molly Davis vs Deborah Cnota / Arica McCracken3-6, 6-2, 2-4
2023-06-19vs Five Seasons KentuckySplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Halcomb / Laurie Trippet vs Krista Mcginness / Christine Frey6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Davis / Gibson Purdom Arling vs Anne Arnsperger / Kelli Griffin6-3, 3-6, 4-3
2023-06-12vs CamargoWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarole Meldon / Sarah Edwards vs Linda Denecke / Dara Hudson2-6, 7-5, 0-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Arthur / Lisa Schwartz vs Shellie Leder / Jomana Dobbs6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wenger / Janice Przezdziecki vs Katie de Alarcon / Liz Zipfel7-5, 6-1
2023-06-05vs Queen City ChromeLost 13
L#1 DoublesJanice Przezdziecki / Terri Schantz vs Jeanne Miller / Heather Tash3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Reisert vs MacKenzie Hammel5-7, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Arthur / Sarah Edwards vs Paula Danis / Kate Noel Wells0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaya Maurer / Molly Davis vs Stephanie Moler / Amy Schmitt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-22vs Queen City RedLost 13
L#1 DoublesJanice Przezdziecki / Terri Schantz vs Lisa Prows / Bethe Orlando6-7, 3-4
L#1 SinglesCarole Meldon vs Angela Clark0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Arthur / Maya Maurer vs Julie Krummen / Connie Allen3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMolly Davis / Dori Morelock vs Deborah Cnota / Jennifer Kendall-Smith6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Spring Day A 18&O 4.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Terri Schantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Maya Maurer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Wenger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Gibson Purdom Arling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Laurie Trippet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Carole Meldon
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Molly Tyger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Dori Morelock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Halcomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Przezdziecki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Megan Reisert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Molly Davis
published
Pam Hoynes
published
Susan Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Przezdziecki + Pam Hoynes3259% games+4.6% vs expected
Maya Maurer + Terri Schantz5060% games+3.6% vs expected
Janice Przezdziecki + Elizabeth Wenger5455% games−5.6% vs expected
Carole Meldon + Gibson Purdom Arling1440% games−9.8% vs expected
Gibson Purdom Arling + Dori Morelock2342% games−11.2% vs expected
Pam Hoynes + Elizabeth Wenger5453% games−13.8% vs expected
Terri Schantz + Janice Przezdziecki4353% gamesnot enough data
Carole Meldon + Janice Przezdziecki134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terri Schantz
35W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Maya Maurer
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Wenger
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Gibson Purdom Arling
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Trippet
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carole Meldon
12W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Molly Tyger
94W–83L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
4
Dori Morelock
3W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
Emily Halcomb
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Janice Przezdziecki
32W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Reisert
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Molly Davis
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Hoynes
36W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Arthur
25W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.