Teams

Five Seasons Kentucky

2023 OH OV Spring Day A18&O W Cincinnati · 2023 Spring Day A 18&O 4.0W Cincinnati

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs CamargoLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Frey / Amanda Ehme vs Ashley Long / MacKenzie Curt6-2, 6-7, 2-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Schenthal / Janice Greenhalgh vs Linda Denecke / Dara Hudson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Griffin / Anne Arnsperger vs Katie de Alarcon / Lauren Grote4-6, 3-6
2023-07-10vs Queen City ChromeLost 13
L#1 DoublesTheresa Schenthal / Christine Frey vs Jeanne Miller / Heather Tash2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesFrancie Case vs Stephanie Moler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMindy Hodge / Barbi Demoss vs Kate Noel Wells / Maureen Ernst1-6, 6-3, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Greenhalgh / Krista Mcginness vs Aimee Boettcher / Paula Danis3-6, 5-7
2023-06-26vs Queen City RedWon 31
W#1 DoublesMindy Hodge / Amanda Ehme vs Ann Roda / Ashlee Kenner6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTheresa Schenthal vs Connie Allen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDina Gibson / Barbi Demoss vs Deborah Cnota / Linda Toerner4-6, 6-4, 0-3
W#3 DoublesEugenie Kreutzjans / Janice Greenhalgh vs Jennifer Kendall-Smith / Pamela Williams6-7, 5-1, 1-0
2023-06-19vs HarpersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrista Mcginness / Christine Frey vs Emily Halcomb / Laurie Trippet7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Arnsperger / Kelli Griffin vs Molly Davis / Gibson Purdom Arling3-6, 6-3, 3-4
2023-06-05vs CamargoWon 40
W#1 DoublesMindy Hodge / Theresa Schenthal vs Linda Denecke / Katie de Alarcon6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristine Frey vs MacKenzie Curt3-6, 6-4, 3-2
W#2 DoublesBarbi Demoss / Krista Mcginness vs Dara Hudson / Stacy Hiatt6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelli Griffin / Janice Greenhalgh vs Jennifer Morgan / Lauren Grote6-3, 6-1
2023-05-22vs Queen City ChromeWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarbi Demoss / Dina Gibson vs Maureen Ernst / Leigh Ann Schinaman4-6, 6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesFrancie Case vs Stephanie Moler2-6, 6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMindy Hodge / Theresa Schenthal vs Jennifer Nye / Susan Eberlein6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Arnsperger / Eugenie Kreutzjans vs Dana Hecker / Lauren Keith2-6, 0-6
2023-05-15vs Queen City RedWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristine Frey / Amanda Ehme vs Linda Toerner / Jennifer Antaki7-6, 3-6, 1-2
W#1 SinglesFrancie Case vs Amy Ellis6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTheresa Schenthal / Janice Greenhalgh vs Michelle Halonen / Bethe Orlando6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEugenie Kreutzjans / Anne Arnsperger vs Ashlee Kenner / Lisa Connelly5-7, 6-2, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Spring Day A 18&O 4.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Francie Case
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Christine Frey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
Anne Arnsperger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Barbi Demoss
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dina Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Amanda Ehme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Mindy Hodge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Theresa Schenthal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Eugenie Kreutzjans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Janice Greenhalgh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kelli Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Krista Mcginness
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Hodge + Theresa Schenthal13365% games+9.6% vs expected
Christine Frey + Eugenie Kreutzjans4257% games+8.8% vs expected
Krista Mcginness + Eugenie Kreutzjans6363% games+2.8% vs expected
Mindy Hodge + Barbi Demoss3250% games+0.3% vs expected
Eugenie Kreutzjans + Mindy Hodge61047% games−2.5% vs expected
Kelli Griffin + Anne Arnsperger4647% games−6.7% vs expected
Mindy Hodge + Dina Gibson9167% gamesnot enough data
Christine Frey + Dina Gibson1638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Francie Case
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Christine Frey
30W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Anne Arnsperger
16W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Barbi Demoss
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dina Gibson
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amanda Ehme
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Mindy Hodge
63W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Theresa Schenthal
42W–24L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Eugenie Kreutzjans
45W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Janice Greenhalgh
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelli Griffin
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Krista Mcginness
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.