Teams

MD.Pilz

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-02vs BENT.StratemeierLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Cork / Kelly Pfrommer vs Mary Jo Ford / Jenn Hartner1-6, 0-6
2025-04-25vs ACP.OgrenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKelly Pfrommer vs Kendall Ogren7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSue Mooney / Katie Cork vs Ruth Smith / Lauren Doyle1-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs LOCH.FinucaneLost 01
L#1 SinglesNikki Thigpen vs Erin Cockayne4-6, 3-6
2025-03-14vs ANP.FehervariLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonay Zies / Jennifer Crumpler vs Katie Lilly / Kelly Coman3-6, 0-6
2025-03-12vs ACP.OgrenWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteph Frohock / Nikki Thigpen vs Jamee Wallace / Debra Reuther6-0, 6-1
2025-03-09vs LOCH.FinucaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonay Zies / Steph Frohock vs Erin Cockayne / Tracey King2-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs BENT.StratemeierLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Pfrommer / Mary Ashley Hill vs Megan Wagner / Jenn Hartner1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNikki Thigpen / Sue Mooney vs Sharon Newton / Mary Jo Ford4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Julia Wade
published
2.68
Jonay Zies
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.68
Melissa Keener
published
2.44
Steph Frohock
published
2.44
Nikki Thigpen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Laurie Godfrey
published
2.35
Mary Ashley Hill
published
2.33
Annie Pilz
published 2.5
2.31
Kelly Pfrommer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Victoria Helms
published
2.20
Katie Cork
published
2.16
Katherine Ruffolo
published
2.13
Sue Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Thigpen + Jonay Zies4739% games−31.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Wade
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
2.5
Jonay Zies
27W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Melissa Keener
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Steph Frohock
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Nikki Thigpen
15W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Laurie Godfrey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Mary Ashley Hill
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Annie Pilz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Kelly Pfrommer
27W–61L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Victoria Helms
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Katie Cork
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Katherine Ruffolo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Sue Mooney
51W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.