Teams

LOCH.Finucane

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-02vs ANP.FehervariSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Tracey King vs Yuna Kim / Julie Pedraza1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesErin Cockayne vs Malinda Hain6-3, 6-4
2025-04-30vs ACP.OgrenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Tracey King vs Kendall Ogren / Ann Mullins6-1, 6-3
2025-04-16vs BENT.StratemeierLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Austin / Cathy Brooks vs Amy Alford / Mary Jo Ford2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTracey King vs Megan Wagner0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hendricks / Laura Petroski vs Jackie Obediente / Brittany Rook7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-09vs ACP.OgrenLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Cockayne vs Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee3-6, 4-6
2025-03-28vs MD.PilzWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Cockayne vs Nikki Thigpen6-4, 6-3
2025-03-21vs BENT.StratemeierLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Finucane / Erin Cockayne vs Jenn Hartner / Megan Wagner2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Shames / Lisa Capetanos vs Gwen Louis / Mari Stratemeier2-6, 3-6
2025-03-09vs MD.PilzWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Brooks / Lisa Capetanos vs Melissa Keener / Annie Pilz6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesErin Cockayne / Tracey King vs Jonay Zies / Steph Frohock6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Lisa Capetanos
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.67
Erin Cockayne
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 2.5
2.50
Amy Denton
published 2.5
2.50
Katie Austin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Tracey King
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.37
Ashley Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Andrea Finucane
published 2.5
2.33
Kimberly Shames
published
2.21
Pam Letts
published
Laura Petroski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Cockayne + Lisa Capetanos13755% games+10.3% vs expected
Andrea Finucane + Pam Letts033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Shames + Ashley Hendricks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Capetanos
41W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
2.5
Erin Cockayne
50W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
2.5
Amy Denton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Katie Austin
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Tracey King
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Ashley Hendricks
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Andrea Finucane
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Kimberly Shames
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Pam Letts
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Laura Petroski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.