Teams

TOC.Cuccaro

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs TING.RiderWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Yi / Olga Tiselsky vs Leah Weinberger / Terry Perrone6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Tanya Barcinas vs Kimberly Patrey / Rebecca Reynolds1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Miho Ogura vs Laura Ross / Kelly Townsend6-4, 6-4
2025-09-28vs TOC.KempfWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Haire / Olga Tiselsky vs Lisa Kempf / Emily Johnson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Julie Tapp vs Jessica Phillips / Camille Conzola6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Miho Ogura vs Lydia Pasteris / Virginia Lewis1-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs TOC.LiWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Julie Tapp vs Emily Yang / Lirong Zhao6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Ganong / Aulia Tandradinata vs Lijun Chen / Nan Hu4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesErika Bailey / Olga Tiselsky vs Lusia Li / Shirley Kim6-1, 7-6
2025-09-14vs TOC.EverittLost 12
L#1 DoublesMiho Ogura / Meghan Howard vs Meghan Yancey / Daphne Poulk2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNora Lenahan / Connie Kim vs Erin McAllister / Elissa Coughlin6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKay Kajiwara / Nancy Haire vs McKenzie Keenan Osman / Rachel Matthews4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-24vs TING.RiderSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNora Lenahan / Miho Ogura vs Emily Childs / Terry Perrone6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAulia Tandradinata / Olga Tiselsky vs Kimberly Patrey / Kelly Townsend4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-17vs TOC.KempfSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAudrey Yi / Miho Ogura vs Theresa Stone / Camille Conzola6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Tanya Barcinas vs Jane Hunter / Nicole Peterson3-6, 1-6
2025-08-10vs TOC.LiWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Rank / Olga Tiselsky vs Lirong Zhao / Nan Hu6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNora Lenahan / Aulia Tandradinata vs Lusia Li / Lijun Chen6-0, 6-1
2025-08-03vs TOC.EverittLost 12
W#1 DoublesAulia Tandradinata / Erika Bailey vs Meghan Yancey / Jeanie White4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Tapp / Kay Kajiwara vs Rachel Matthews / McKenzie Keenan Osman5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Miho Ogura vs Erin McAllister / Anna Bentley7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Nora Lenahan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Stacy Rank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Audrey Yi
published 4
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.68
Sarah Ganong
published
3.65
Erika Bailey
published
3.56
Kay Kajiwara
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Miho Ogura
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Aulia Tandradinata
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Helen Cuccaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Nancy Haire
published
3.19
Olga Tiselsky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Barcinas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Julie Tapp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Yi + Nora Lenahan2448% games+2.8% vs expected
Helen Cuccaro + Miho Ogura6849% games+2.6% vs expected
Kay Kajiwara + Miho Ogura4546% games+2.4% vs expected
Stacy Rank + Meghan Howard6162% games−3.7% vs expected
Helen Cuccaro + Kay Kajiwara131551% games−7.6% vs expected
Kay Kajiwara + Julie Tapp8850% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Barcinas + Miho Ogura6651% gamesnot enough data
Olga Tiselsky + Kay Kajiwara3646% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nora Lenahan
165W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4
Stacy Rank
283W–91L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Audrey Yi
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Sarah Ganong
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Erika Bailey
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Kay Kajiwara
125W–123L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Miho Ogura
277W–247L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Aulia Tandradinata
283W–128L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Helen Cuccaro
129W–198L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Nancy Haire
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Olga Tiselsky
127W–135L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Tanya Barcinas
205W–149L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Julie Tapp
116W–134L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.