Teams

TOC.Li

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-19vs TOC.KempfWon 10
W#2 DoublesLusia Li / Lirong Zhao vs Camille Conzola / Emily Johnson6-1, 6-0
2025-09-28vs TOC.EverittLost 02
L#1 DoublesLijun Chen / Lusia Li vs Christine Hughes / Daphne Poulk2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLirong Zhao / Shirley Kim vs Zana Piric / Laura Rendon5-7, 4-6
2025-09-21vs TOC.CuccaroLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Yang / Lirong Zhao vs Kay Kajiwara / Julie Tapp4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLusia Li / Shirley Kim vs Erika Bailey / Olga Tiselsky1-6, 6-7
2025-09-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLirong Zhao / Lijun Chen vs Kristen Fuller / Rebecca Reynolds6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-07vs TOC.KempfSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNan Hu / Lusia Li vs Emily Johnson / Jessica Phillips4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Yang / Lirong Zhao vs Theresa Stone / Laurie Reiss0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-17vs TOC.EverittLost 02
L#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Shirley Kim vs Anna Bentley / Rachel Matthews3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLusia Li / Lijun Chen vs Zana Piric / Amy Hobbs6-7, 3-6
2025-08-10vs TOC.CuccaroLost 02
L#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Nan Hu vs Stacy Rank / Olga Tiselsky3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLusia Li / Lijun Chen vs Nora Lenahan / Aulia Tandradinata0-6, 1-6
2025-08-03vs TING.RiderWon 20
W#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Nan Hu vs Laura Ross / Abigail Holden6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLusia Li / Emily Yang vs Leah Weinberger / Angela Ray4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lirong Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.48
Lusia Li
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.44
Lijun Chen
published
3.42
Nan Hu
published
3.31
Emily Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Yang + Lusia Li5170% games+15.0% vs expected
Lirong Zhao + Nan Hu224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Yang + Nan Hu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lirong Zhao
28W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Lusia Li
65W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Lijun Chen
22W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Nan Hu
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Emily Yang
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.