Teams

SFTC - Wallenstein

2022 55&Over Mixed · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-24vs GearyWon 21
W#1 DoublesCori Knupp / Kenneth Alweis vs Peter Greetham / Kim Waale1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Kurt Watson vs Richard Hall / Deborah Cavanagh3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Brockelman / Lisa Campagna vs Ruth Sikora / Michael Sikora6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-18vs Syr: Nelligan / VaccoLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Crane / Thomas Brockelman vs Maureen Anderson / Sean Hynes2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarylou Watson / Kurt Watson vs Kathleen Jordan / Ole Westergaard0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmmy Helander / William Shampine vs Melody Fredrickson / Danilo Fernando3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-25vs GearyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Greetham / Kurt Watson vs MARCY DEMBS / CHRISTOPHER DEMBS6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAudrey Sauer / William Shampine vs Marianne Lee / HANSEOK KIM2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCori Knupp / Kenneth Alweis vs Ruth Sikora / Michael Sikora7-5, 6-4
2022-02-18vs Syr: Nelligan / VaccoLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Shampine / Lisa Campagna vs Mary Kaye / Sean Hynes5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarylou Watson / Kurt Watson vs Kathleen Jordan / Ole Westergaard3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Crane / Steven Blusk vs Lisa Nelligan / Danilo Fernando2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-04vs GearyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Alweis / Cori Knupp vs MARCY DEMBS / CHRISTOPHER DEMBS3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarylou Watson / Kurt Watson vs Deborah Cavanagh / HANSEOK KIM2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Brockelman / Gwenn Judge vs Ruth Sikora / Michael Sikora6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-28vs Syr: Nelligan / VaccoLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Campagna / William Shampine vs Mary Kaye / Sean Hynes6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Kenneth Alweis vs Kathleen Jordan / Ole Westergaard0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Steven Blusk vs Lisa Nelligan / Danilo Fernando1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Syr: Nelligan / Vacco6015310106
2Geary2481021163
3SFTC - Wallenstein1541431201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Cori Knupp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Jonathan Dee
published 3.5
3.32
William Shampine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Emmy Helander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Andrew Wallenstein
published 3.5
3.14
Lisa Campagna
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Gwenn Judge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Juliet Concilla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Audrey Sauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Barbara Crane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bee Tolman
published
Kenneth Alweis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kurt Watson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Marylou Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Greetham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Brockelman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Watson + Marylou Watson01322% games−8.7% vs expected
Cori Knupp + Kenneth Alweis4248% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Concilla + Andrew Wallenstein134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Brockelman + Audrey Sauer224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Brockelman + Lisa Campagna134 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Sauer + William Shampine044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Campagna + William Shampine134 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Dee + Susan Greetham224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cori Knupp
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Jonathan Dee
96W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
William Shampine
15W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Emmy Helander
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Wallenstein
70W–58L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Campagna
90W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gwenn Judge
45W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Juliet Concilla
131W–137L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Audrey Sauer
20W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Barbara Crane
13W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Bee Tolman
10W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Alweis
22W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kurt Watson
7W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marylou Watson
8W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Greetham
27W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Brockelman
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.