Teams

LTA-Q GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs CVTA REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Emma West vs Nancy Fishbein / Erin Leyba7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Ana Jaffe2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Lindsay Roland vs Amy Conway / Chesley McColl2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Silvana Hose6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Melissa Karch vs Jessica Catlin / Gwen Kataoka3-6, 4-6
2026-05-25vs NJ YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesEmma West / Erika Cistone vs Mary Shugrue / Mary Rose Wilder6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Scharrer vs Audrey Austin5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Roland / Tammy Duerksen vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Jill Orsatti2-6, 3-1
W#2 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Barbara Westfall6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelissa Karch / Amy Kirtland vs JANE PARIS / Patti Warner4-6, 4-6
2026-05-24vs BRMST REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Krystal Thomas vs Jody Knaley / Suzanna Black2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMary Scharrer vs Rumi Arakawa5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Melissa Karch vs Micheline Gardner / Lisa Shaver4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Tracy Klein5-7, 3-6
2026-05-18vs CVTA GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Krystal Thomas vs Louise Fowler / Terry Tessier6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Scharrer vs Sofia Vidal-cardenas6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Lindsay Roland vs Maggie Brubaker / Nancy Stern1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Teresa Chapman5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Silver / Melissa Karch vs Carole Brandt / Heather Dragon Graham4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-11vs BCC GOLDLost 23
W#1 DoublesEmma West / Erika Cistone vs Lalenia Quinlan Aweida / Kristin Kalush6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Scharrer vs Amy Nichols6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Roland / Tammy Duerksen vs Anna Bertagnolli / Juliana Cohen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Linda Mounce4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Karch / Amelia Curtis vs Helen Spiridellis / Laura Studebaker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-21vs RCC BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesEmma West / Erika Cistone vs Lisa Arndt / Elizabeth Odegaard6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Mary Gritzmacher0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Sarah Silver vs Dani Anderson / SARA CONWAY4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Jennifer Flaherty1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Karch / Mary Scharrer vs Kirsten Coppo / Stephanie Curtis7-6, 6-4
2026-04-13vs MEA NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesEmma West / Erika Cistone vs Judy Savage / Holly Semanske6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Cristin Hanson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Scharrer / Sarah Silver vs Andrea Barsch / Nelly Dawallu7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLindsay Roland vs Rebecca DiMaio6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Kirtland / Melissa Karch vs Jennifer Hushka / Karen Brungard6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mary Scharrer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.88
Emma West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Amy Kirtland
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Lindsay Roland
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.78
Amelia Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Erika Cistone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Karch
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.69
Krystal Thomas
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.46
Sarah Silver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Tammy Duerksen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Silver + Amelia Curtis2351% games+5.2% vs expected
Tammy Duerksen + Lindsay Roland391656% games+3.0% vs expected
Erika Cistone + Emma West311555% games+0.6% vs expected
Melissa Karch + Amy Kirtland6255% games−0.4% vs expected
Krystal Thomas + Erika Cistone4742% games−4.2% vs expected
Tammy Duerksen + Krystal Thomas0836% games−9.3% vs expected
Tammy Duerksen + Erika Cistone2442% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Duerksen + Emma West3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Scharrer
23W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Emma West
53W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Amy Kirtland
17W–17L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Lindsay Roland
87W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Amelia Curtis
3W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Erika Cistone
78W–45L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Melissa Karch
19W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Krystal Thomas
36W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Silver
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Tammy Duerksen
76W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.