Teams

RCC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-30vs BCC GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrenna Hermes / Felicia Fry vs Lauren Christin / Kirsten Eldridge2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Amy Nichols1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDani Anderson vs Anna Bertagnolli7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMorgan Ernzen / Kirsten Coppo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-14vs CVTA REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesKatie Dittmer / Mary Gritzmacher vs Erin Leyba / Nancy Fishbein6-1
W#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Silvana Hose6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Witte / Dani Anderson vs Lauren Merkel / Jessica Catlin6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Molly Warnken6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSARA CONWAY / Brenna Hermes vs Ana Jaffe / Chesley McColl4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-13vs CVTA GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesDanielle Witte / Morgan Ernzen vs Jennifer Dingman / Louise Fowler1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMary Gritzmacher vs Teresa Chapman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFelicia Fry / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Nancy Stern / Lori Bird6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKristen Hamill vs Sofia Vidal-cardenas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSARA CONWAY / Kirsten Coppo vs Holly Sprenkle / Carole Brandt6-3, 6-1
2026-05-11vs MEA NAVYWon 32
L#1 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Kristen Hamill vs Judy Savage / Andrea Barsch2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Gritzmacher vs Cristin Hanson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFelicia Fry / Dani Anderson vs Tina Aweida / Karen Brungard6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRilla Baca vs Kelly McGahan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMorgan Ernzen / Danielle Witte vs Miriam McCarty / Jenny Stroud6-4, 6-4
2026-05-04vs NJ YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrenna Hermes / SARA CONWAY vs Patti Warner / Jill Orsatti5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Gritzmacher vs Natalie Berner6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDani Anderson / Danielle Witte vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Reilly Braun2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRilla Baca vs Meredith Beveridge0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Odegaard / Kristen Hamill vs Barbara Westfall / JANE PARIS6-0, 6-3
2026-04-21vs LTA-Q GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Arndt / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Emma West / Erika Cistone4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMary Gritzmacher vs Krystal Thomas6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDani Anderson / SARA CONWAY vs Amelia Curtis / Sarah Silver6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Stephanie Curtis vs Melissa Karch / Mary Scharrer6-7, 4-6
2026-04-13vs BRMST REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Dittmer / Elizabeth Odegaard vs Janine Huber / Tracy Klein6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRilla Baca vs Jennifer Cooper1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Hamill / Danielle Witte vs Jody Knaley / Rumi Arakawa0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesDani Anderson vs Micheline Gardner6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesFelicia Fry / Kirsten Coppo vs Karen Gallo / Sarah Monzyk1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Mary Gritzmacher
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.93
Kristen Hamill
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Katie Dittmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Felicia Fry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Dani Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
Morgan Ernzen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
SARA CONWAY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Brenna Hermes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.67
Stephanie Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Kirsten Coppo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Odegaard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Danielle Witte
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Lisa Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Torrey Banks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Ernzen + Brenna Hermes3642% games−9.8% vs expected
Felicia Fry + Danielle Witte134 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Coppo + Felicia Fry213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Hamill + Danielle Witte033 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Witte + Elizabeth Odegaard213 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Witte + Dani Anderson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Gritzmacher
53W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Kristen Hamill
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katie Dittmer
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Felicia Fry
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Dani Anderson
7W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Morgan Ernzen
38W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
SARA CONWAY
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Brenna Hermes
34W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Stephanie Curtis
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Kirsten Coppo
48W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Odegaard
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Danielle Witte
54W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Lisa Arndt
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Torrey Banks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.