Teams

OC Monarch Beach - Randi - Sat1030

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 8.0 Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 10:30 AM
Monarch Beach Tennis Club
Sep 19 10:30 AM
vs N/A
Randi Reznik
Sep 26 10:30 AM
Monarch Beach Tennis Club
Oct 3 10:30 AM
Monarch Beach Tennis Club
Oct 10 10:30 AM
vs N/A
Randi Reznik
Oct 17 1:00 PM
Laguna Woods Tennis Club
2026-08-22vs OC Seal Beach - Kathy SAT12Won 21
W#1 DoublesBette Kerhoulas / Susan Hagstrom vs Karen Kredel / Nikki Nance6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Roeske / Julie Teltscher vs Kathy Zepeda Emerzian / Christie Boniface6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRandi Reznik / Betty Youndt vs Brenda Danielson / Mary DeVlugt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-15vs OC Laguna Woods - Deidre - Sat1Won 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Teltscher / Susan Hagstrom vs Elizabeth Frost / Cheryl Hirtler6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatti Roeske / Cinda Churm vs Theresa Kennedy / Terry Ward6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Reenders / Lynn Moore vs Sheryl Leicher / Cora Davis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · OC Women 8.0 Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Monarch Beach - Randi - Sat1030103007
2OC Seal Beach - Kathy SAT12000000
3OC Laguna Woods - Deidre - Sat10103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Christine Reenders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Daren Collins
published 4
3.91
Cynthia Neiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Bette Kerhoulas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Patti Roeske
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
3.81
Betty Youndt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cinda Churm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Randi Reznik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Teltscher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Hagstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Youndt + Randi Reznik2364% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Daren Collins
22W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Cynthia Neiman
28W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Bette Kerhoulas
62W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Patti Roeske
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Denise Vallin-Corona
91W–57L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Betty Youndt
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Cinda Churm
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Randi Reznik
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Julie Teltscher
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Hagstrom
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.