Teams

OC Seal Beach - Kathy SAT12

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Women 8.0 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 5 10:30 AM
vs N/A
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
Sep 12 10:30 AM
Monarch Beach Tennis Club
Sep 19 11:30 AM
Seal Beach Tennis Center
Sep 26 10:30 AM
vs N/A
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
Oct 3 10:30 AM
Monarch Beach Tennis Club
Oct 10 11:30 AM
Seal Beach Tennis Center
2026-08-22vs OC Monarch Beach - Randi - Sat1030Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Kredel / Nikki Nance vs Bette Kerhoulas / Susan Hagstrom1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Zepeda Emerzian / Christie Boniface vs Patti Roeske / Julie Teltscher4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Danielson / Mary DeVlugt vs Randi Reznik / Betty Youndt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · OC Women 8.0 Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Monarch Beach - Randi - Sat1030103007
2OC Seal Beach - Kathy SAT12000000
3OC Laguna Woods - Deidre - Sat10103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Christie Boniface
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Julie Lessley
published 4
3.80
Christy Akin
published 4
3.77
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Michele Savoie
published
3.69
3.69
Karen Kredel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Brenda Danielson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Christeen Field
published 4
3.66
Mary DeVlugt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
3.42
Elizabeth Rogers
published
Eileen Kaiser
published
Nikki Nance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Fitzgerald + Julie Lessley6256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Boniface
97W–88L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Julie Lessley
95W–64L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Christy Akin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Michele Savoie
21W–14L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Deborah Fitzgerald
178W–201L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Karen Kredel
42W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Brenda Danielson
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Christeen Field
95W–83L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Mary DeVlugt
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Elizabeth Rogers
22W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
Eileen Kaiser
19W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.