Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs LEBTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Reed / Lisa McGavern vs LISA HAGEN / Cynthia Glasier1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Brooke Sterling vs Becky Glenn / Carmel Walz5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-22vs CK REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Nice / Lisa McGavern vs Mary Thompson / Ann Hugh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Jane Braaten vs Lisa Herring / Anita Kinder2-6, 4-6
2022-06-15vs MC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Julie Reed vs Leslie Hauschildt / Michelle Workman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Brooke Sterling vs Ana Bland / Ciel Lawrence7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Nice / Carmel Hanson vs Kathleen Keating / Teri Harrington4-6, 4-6
2022-06-08vs PH TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Reed / Lisa McGavern vs Shawna Morgan / Wynne Freeman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Kathleen Samuelli vs Nhung Van / Christina Quigley6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Nice / Gretchen Burr vs Lori Silliman / Melodie Harris3-6, 6-7
2022-06-01vs HRCA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Jane Braaten vs Janet Burns / Jana Warwick6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Sterling / Gretchen Burr vs Kathe Gouin / Marti Wedewer1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Diana Nice vs Joyce Naylon / Robin Cann4-6, 3-6
2022-05-25vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Kathleen Samuelli vs Philippa Biggi / Leann Koontz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Reed / Lisa McGavern vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-20vs CK REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Diana Nice vs Stephanie Courtney / Katherine Phillips6-3, 6-3
2022-05-18vs KC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa McGavern / Julie Reed vs Suzy Farrell / Jean Dixon6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Braaten / Claudia Swanson vs Joyce Ringstrand / Linda Paysinger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGretchen Burr / Brooke Sterling vs Pamela Kennel / Susan Hartley6-3, 6-1
2022-05-11vs LEBTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa McGavern / Julie Reed vs Sandy Stocker / LISA HAGEN6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Diana Nice vs Kathleen Walters / Jennifer Traylor4-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs MC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Reed / Lisa McGavern vs Lauren Arnold / Janice Tanabe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Jane Braaten vs Ciel Lawrence / Leslie Hauschildt4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Diana Nice vs Kathleen Keating / Teri Harrington6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lisa McGavern
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brooke Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Gretchen Burr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kathleen Samuelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Carmel Hanson
published 3.5
2.93
Diana Nice
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.91
Jane Braaten
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Julie Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ileen Cummiskey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Sterling + Claudia Swanson9754% games+4.0% vs expected
Diana Nice + Jane Braaten121348% games+1.2% vs expected
Julie Reed + Lisa McGavern7847% games−0.3% vs expected
Brooke Sterling + Kathleen Samuelli71348% games−0.4% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Gretchen Burr131351% games−1.6% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Claudia Swanson151148% games−1.7% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Carmel Hanson2441% games−5.6% vs expected
Diana Nice + Gretchen Burr1538% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa McGavern
67W–127L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Brooke Sterling
36W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gretchen Burr
86W–95L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Swanson
67W–60L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kathleen Samuelli
90W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carmel Hanson
9W–27L career · type S · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Diana Nice
66W–126L career · 7 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.93
3
Jane Braaten
103W–196L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Julie Reed
29W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Ileen Cummiskey
34W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.