Teams

BM RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs HRCA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeg Lutes / Susan Hickel vs Elizabeth Zenk / Joyce Naylon1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Philippa Biggi vs Alice Soderman / Robin Cann3-6, 1-6
2022-06-22vs MC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeann Koontz / Carol Markley vs Leslie Hauschildt / Michelle Workman0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hobson / Patrice Matteson vs Ana Bland / Ciel Lawrence1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Meg Lutes vs Teri Harrington / Kathleen Keating7-6, 6-3
2022-06-15vs KC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Hobson / Muffy Steinhoff vs Jean Dixon / Suzy Farrell7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Meg Lutes vs DeAnne Smith / Joyce Ringstrand6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Markley / Leann Koontz vs Susan Hartley / Janet McMahon6-4, 6-2
2022-06-10vs CK REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Markley / Muffy Steinhoff vs Ann Hugh / Mary Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Lutes / Mary Hobson vs Anita Kinder / Vicki Kern0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Susan Hickel vs Judith Barnes / Stephanie Courtney1-6, 2-6
2022-06-08vs LEBTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesLeann Koontz / Meg Lutes vs LISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Markley / Muffy Steinhoff vs Vickie Conroy / VANESSA TURNBULL0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Susan Hickel vs Jeanne Dearth / Margie Walsh2-6, 6-7
2022-05-25vs LEBTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Leann Koontz vs Claudia Swanson / Kathleen Samuelli6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Hobson / Muffy Steinhoff vs Brooke Sterling / Ileen Cummiskey7-5, 6-2
2022-05-18vs PH TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Markley / Mary Hobson vs Melodie Harris / Lori Silliman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hickel / Muffy Steinhoff vs Suzanne Perkins / Kristin McDonald1-6, 0-6
2022-05-11vs HRCA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Miley / Muffy Steinhoff vs Jana Warwick / Marti Wedewer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Hobson / Carol Markley vs Joyce Naylon / Mary Vrabel6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Patrice Matteson vs Janet Burns / Kathe Gouin1-6, 1-6
2022-05-04vs MC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Hobson / Patrice Matteson vs Ellen Davis / Deborah Bautista2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hickel / Jane Miley vs Janice Tanabe / Lauren Arnold4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeann Koontz / Philippa Biggi vs Kathleen Keating / Teri Harrington2-6, 4-6
2022-04-27vs KC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrice Matteson / Mary Hobson vs Linda Paysinger / Joyce Ringstrand5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Markley / Philippa Biggi vs Jean Dixon / Suzy Farrell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Jane Miley vs Cheryl Alley / Pamela Kennel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Susan Hickel
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Carol Markley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.69
Philippa Biggi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.63
Muffy Steinhoff
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.59
Leann Koontz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Mary Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jane Miley
published
Janet Lane
published
Meg Lutes
published
Patrice Matteson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philippa Biggi + Leann Koontz41142% games+4.3% vs expected
Susan Hickel + Philippa Biggi101050% games−6.7% vs expected
Muffy Steinhoff + Jane Miley3345% games−7.4% vs expected
Carol Markley + Janet Lane31338% gamesnot enough data
Carol Markley + Mary Hobson4643% gamesnot enough data
Susan Hickel + Leann Koontz1636% gamesnot enough data
Carol Markley + Leann Koontz213 matchesnot enough data
Philippa Biggi + Mary Hobson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Susan Hickel
30W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Carol Markley
24W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Philippa Biggi
62W–106L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Muffy Steinhoff
34W–67L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Leann Koontz
54W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Mary Hobson
34W–65L career · 8 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jane Miley
4W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Lane
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meg Lutes
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrice Matteson
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.