Teams

Arbor Greene Miss Hits - C. VanMeter

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2020-12-19vs Westchase - K. DeAngeloWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenys Hubbard / Crystal Vanmeter vs Kristen DeAngelo / Monika Leon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Gaier vs MOIRA KONYK7-5, 6-4
2020-12-18vs Van Dyke Racq Pacq - S. FarkasWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelley Coffey / Rebecca Gaier vs Sally Farkas / Angela Huber6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs Stephanie van Brocklin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSandra Bell / Rebecca Gaier vs Tracy MacKechnie / Caroline Thaxton6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2020-11-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Denys Hubbard vs MOIRA KONYK / Kristen DeAngelo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / AMY ISAAC vs Kelly Machonis / Jennifer Duglin6-4, 6-2
2020-10-26vs Heritage Isles - C. NguyenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Crystal Vanmeter vs Cuc Nguyen / Carrie Stiers6-3, 6-1
2020-10-19vs Van Dyke Racq Pacq - S. FarkasWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Denys Hubbard vs Sally Farkas / Angela Huber6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / AMY ISAAC vs Sarah Weaver / Courtney Steiner6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDenys Hubbard / AMY ISAAC vs Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk / Amy Rairigh6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
AMY ISAAC
published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Gaier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
2.90
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.75
Denys Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Sandra Bell
published
2.63
Amy Butts
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denys Hubbard + Rebecca Gaier11554% games−0.3% vs expected
Rebecca Gaier + AMY ISAAC121055% gamesnot enough data
Denys Hubbard + AMY ISAAC5060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMY ISAAC
107W–59L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 8 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Denys Hubbard
126W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Sandra Bell
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.