Teams

LTFC PURPLE

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

11 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-20vs CACI GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / Ashley Agrelius vs Cydney Springer / Chad Picard0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMacK Hone / Ashley Gonzales vs Amy Springer / Mustafa Neemuchwala6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-13vs GAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Gonzales / William Wall vs Ben Hutchings / Jill Hanafee4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarter Harrington / Tanya Harrington vs Saryn Mooney / Matthew Warnicke3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Harrington / Venita Vereen vs Chelsea Ye / Chris Cremer2-6, 0-6
2023-08-06vs SS-H BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / Ashley Agrelius vs Caitlyn Cox / Eric Dao3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarter Harrington / Tanya Harrington vs Ben Williamson / Sydnee Yap3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Harrington / Venita Vereen vs Diem Phan-Boyer / W Hancock3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-30vs LTFC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Wall / Venita Vereen vs James Jaggers / Joy Herrin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Carlson / Carter Harrington vs Donnie Criswell / Rory Jaggers2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKC Agrelius / Angie Sanders vs Cathie Frazzini / Eric Wohl2-6, 0-6
2023-07-23vs SS-LT TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesVenita Vereen / William Wall vs Beth Zubowicz / Steve Zubowicz6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarter Harrington / Tanya Harrington vs Karl Andreasen / Rachel Frisz6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMacK Hone / Angie Sanders vs Jimmy Mountain / Julie Clapham2-6, 4-6
2023-07-16vs CACI GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Sanders / Todd Harrington vs Jenny Wiens / Nate Moeller1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Harrington / Carter Harrington vs Elise Engleberg / Dirk McDermott1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVenita Vereen / William Wall vs Cydney Springer / Louis Engleberg7-6, 7-5
2023-07-09vs GAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Angie Sanders vs Saryn Mooney / Roy Gillespie3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Carlson / Ben Caruso vs Ben Hutchings / Elizabeth Barnacle1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKC Agrelius / Ashley Gonzales vs Claire Douthit / Jay Toslosky7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
KC Agrelius
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
MacK Hone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Tanya Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Colleen Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Venita Vereen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Carter Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Ashley Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
William Wall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ben Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Harrington + Todd Harrington3444% games+1.0% vs expected
Ashley Agrelius + KC Agrelius11136% games−14.8% vs expected
Tanya Harrington + Carter Harrington3343% games−17.8% vs expected
Venita Vereen + William Wall314 matchesnot enough data
Venita Vereen + KC Agrelius033 matchesnot enough data
William Wall + Colleen Carlson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Agrelius
33W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
MacK Hone
30W–34L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Tanya Harrington
37W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Colleen Carlson
58W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Venita Vereen
50W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Carter Harrington
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Ashley Gonzales
82W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
William Wall
37W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.73
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.46
Ben Caruso
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Todd Harrington
16W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.