Teams

SS-H BLUE

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-20vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesDiem Phan-Boyer / W Hancock vs Rory Jaggers / Blair MacNeill2-6, 3-6
2023-08-13vs SS-LT TEALSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSydnee Yap / Pat Kim vs Julie Clapham / Ark Wang6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChayce Cione / Diem Phan-Boyer vs Beth Zubowicz / Steve Zubowicz2-6, 3-6
2023-08-06vs LTFC PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiem Phan-Boyer / W Hancock vs Todd Harrington / Venita Vereen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs GAC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Kim / Caitlyn Cox vs Jill Hanafee / Ben Hutchings4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiem Phan-Boyer / David Du vs Saryn Mooney / Matthew Warnicke3-6, 3-6
2023-07-23vs CACI GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaitlyn Cox / Pat Kim vs Cydney Springer / Mustafa Neemuchwala4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCaroline Dorman / W Hancock vs Amy Springer / Chad Picard3-6, 1-6
2023-07-16vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesDiem Phan-Boyer / David Du vs Travis Beard / Laura Downie3-6, 1-6
2023-07-09vs SS-LT TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaitlyn Cox / Pat Kim vs Alli Berry / Karl Andreasen7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiem Phan-Boyer / W Hancock vs Rachel Frisz / Ark Wang2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Maggie Wilson
published
4.24
Pat Kim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
W Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Diem Phan-Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Sydnee Yap
published
4.07
Eric Dao
published
4.02
Ben Williamson
published 4.5
3.68
Syed Sadiq
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diem Phan-Boyer + Eric Dao3255% games−4.2% vs expected
W Hancock + Diem Phan-Boyer2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Wilson
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Pat Kim
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
W Hancock
44W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Diem Phan-Boyer
39W–92L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
Sydnee Yap
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
Eric Dao
22W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
4.5
Ben Williamson
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
4.02
Syed Sadiq
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.