Teams

Eagle Gals

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-07-07vs Casual SetsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMonica Reagan / Morgan Leavitt vs Karey Hunter / Hillary Lilya6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Chandra Zenner-Ford5-7, 4-6
2021-07-05Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Kristin Lund vs Rebecca Fitzpatrick / Jennifer Wilson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Glory Questad5-7, 6-7
2021-06-30vs Ladytennisty 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Julienne Ferguson vs Jo Roby / Kathy Christensen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Emily Flores3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Denise Schwendener2-6, 4-6
2021-06-23vs Babble AlotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Julienne Ferguson vs Suzanna Murali / Vanessa Almaraz2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Lund vs Peyton Byford2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Leavitt / Shannon Lofton vs Tina Taylor / Christina Peterman6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-06-21vs Nacho-nettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Julienne Ferguson vs Jenny Grunke / Tara Wolf4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Vicki McBride0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Lisa Trujillo-Dunn6-3, 6-2
2021-06-16vs Over ServedLost 02
L#1 DoublesMorgan Leavitt / Monica Reagan vs Jan Fonken / Ashley Tribble4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatheryn Burriesci / Kristin Lund vs Lisa Kasney / Joie Carlisle1-6, 3-6
2021-06-09vs Lunatic FringeLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulienne Ferguson / Morgan Leavitt vs Christina Questad / Karri Jones3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori van Alfen / Kristin Lund vs Judy Murdock / Dana Rosellini1-6, 2-6
2021-06-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Kristin Lund vs Jeanna Rice / Emily Smith6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Amy Mikkelson6-1, 6-4
2021-06-02vs Hear Me RoarLost 12
L#1 DoublesMorgan Leavitt / Karen Mangum vs Karlie Braseth / Ada Hansen3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Lund vs Maria Turner3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulienne Ferguson / Monica Reagan vs Teresa Comiskey / Amy Steckel7-5, 6-2
2021-05-26vs SellsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulienne Ferguson / Monica Reagan vs Adriana Kurtz / Pamela Fields6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Dawn Coder0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Holly Johnson2-6, 5-7
2021-05-24Split 11
W#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Magdalena Kriegh6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Nat Newton4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.53
Karen Mangum
published 4
3.37
Debbie Davies
published 3.5
3.30
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
Amanda Steele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Shannon Lofton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.09
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
3.03
Monica Reagan
published
Julienne Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Kristin Lund
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Lori van Alfen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Morgan Leavitt
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Vicki Osweiler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katheryn Burriesci + Kimberly Cowley7650% games+9.1% vs expected
Nancy Mallory + Katheryn Burriesci6450% games+0.5% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Katheryn Burriesci15458% games−0.2% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Lori van Alfen503254% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Osweiler + Debbie Davies111947% gamesnot enough data
Julienne Ferguson + Karen Mangum121252% gamesnot enough data
Katheryn Burriesci + Lori van Alfen12456% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mallory + Kimberly Cowley9554% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Katheryn Burriesci
108W–95L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Karen Mangum
72W–60L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Debbie Davies
41W–54L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amanda Steele
65W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shannon Lofton
34W–38L career · 10 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Mary Adcox
151W–195L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
Julienne Ferguson
42W–39L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Lund
26W–41L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori van Alfen
51W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Morgan Leavitt
15W–15L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Osweiler
53W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.