Teams

Babble Alots

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.96 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-28vs Each Hit 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNicole Hancock / Sheleen Young vs Kristen Gray / Trudy Fouser6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-23vs Eagle GalsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Shawver / Sheleen Young vs Debbie Davies / Mary Adcox6-1, 6-4
2021-06-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesSheleen Young / Christina Peterman vs Cynthia Copple / Glory Questad6-1, 7-5
2021-06-07vs Casual SetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendy Anderson / Sheleen Young vs Tina Michael / Leslie Michael7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
4.03
Kayce McEwan
published 4
3.91
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.86
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.81
3.77
Nicole Hancock
published 4
Donna Polk
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.69
Suzanne Baran
published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
3.25
Denise Shawver
published 3.5
3.23
Katherine Johnson
published 3.5
Sheleen Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanna Murali + Beth Calvo14657% games+4.5% vs expected
Christina Peterman + Kayce McEwan8259% games+3.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Vanessa Almaraz10558% games+3.6% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Kayce McEwan91248% games−0.2% vs expected
Denise Shawver + Beth Calvo513554% games−0.7% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Suzanna Murali111149% games−1.1% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Katherine Johnson5941% games−2.1% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Beth Calvo151551% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Kayce McEwan
147W–64L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Christina Peterman
138W–91L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Beth Calvo
172W–128L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Colette van de Graaff
74W–48L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Donna Polk
35W–38L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Terry Hardy
212W–302L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Denise Shawver
70W–72L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Katherine Johnson
128W–141L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Sheleen Young
21W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Anderson
58W–50L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.