Teams

KY/LOU/KLAUSING

2022 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Emily Schmidt
published 4
3.52
Sarah Neumann
published
Andrea Wellkamp
published 3.5
3.13
Kelley Roberts
published
3.09
Stacy Klausing
published
3.03
Lynn Supple
published
3.02
Shelby Fill
published
3.02
Keeley Parker
published
2.93
Nikki Prescott
published
2.74
Maria McCauley
published
2.65
Rachel Lacap
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Prescott + Kelley Roberts4349% games+1.8% vs expected
Keeley Parker + Kelley Roberts2645% games−3.0% vs expected
Lynn Supple + Shelby Fill404 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Klausing + Shelby Fill033 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Klausing + Maria McCauley303 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Fill + Maria McCauley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Schmidt
70W–23L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Sarah Neumann
19W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Andrea Wellkamp
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelley Roberts
48W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.13
Stacy Klausing
28W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
Lynn Supple
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
Shelby Fill
30W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Keeley Parker
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nikki Prescott
29W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Maria McCauley
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Rachel Lacap
19W–24L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.