Teams

GreyHawk - Mooney

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs Vineyards /Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Conaway / Louise Gallagher vs Ann Robert / Dianne Mathes6-4, 6-1
2025-02-28vs Pelican Marsh / WhalenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJodi Saxman / Louise Gallagher vs Joyce Bunting / Helen Wardell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Conaway / Jill Seitz vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Debra Purcell3-6, 1-6
2025-02-14vs Royal Poinciana / DentonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Saxman / Kathy Glannon vs Celeste Denton / Paula Whitelaw5-7, 0-6
2025-01-24vs COLLIER/K. Keillor/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouise Gallagher / Jodi Saxman vs Cheryl Copps / Anne Miller3-6, 2-6
2025-01-17vs The Quarry / GoldmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Gallagher / Jodi Saxman vs Norma Goldman / Sue Bolley7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jodi Saxman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diana Provence
published 3
2.60
Cindy Phillips
published 3
Francine Pfohl
published
Jill Seitz
published
Kathy Glannon
published
Louise Gallagher
published
Mary Conaway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Toni Mooney
published
Tracy Cartwright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Conaway + Jill Seitz4255% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Saxman + Louise Gallagher404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Diana Provence
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Phillips
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Francine Pfohl
1W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Seitz
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Glannon
3W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Gallagher
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Conaway
31W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Toni Mooney
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Cartwright
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.