Teams

The Quarry / Goldman

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-28vs Royal Poinciana / DentonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Barbara Gettenberg vs Mary Harvey / Paula Whitelaw1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Kaplan / Gail Voss vs Amy Hoglund / Sheila Bandy6-4, 6-4
2025-02-21vs Village Walk Bonita / McIntireWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Dennie / Audrey Schwartz vs Susan Solomon / Kathryn Begando6-3, 6-4
2025-02-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Bolley / Norma Goldman vs Cheryl Copps / Anne Miller1-6, 3-6
2025-02-07vs Pelican Marsh / WhalenLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Sue Bolley vs Joyce Bunting / Helen Wardell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Dennie / Sharon Sokolsky vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Debra Purcell6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGail Voss / Diane Kaplan vs Diane Bedran / Denise Lautenbach6-3, 6-2
2025-01-31vs Royal Poinciana / DentonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAileen Jacobs / Denise Dennie vs Shari Boehnen / Laura Fitzgibbons6-1, 6-0
2025-01-17vs GreyHawk - MooneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesNorma Goldman / Sue Bolley vs Louise Gallagher / Jodi Saxman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAudrey Schwartz / Denise Dennie vs Kathy Glannon / Jill Seitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAileen Jacobs / Diane Kaplan vs Diana Provence / Tracy Cartwright1-6, 5-7
2025-01-10vs Bay Colony / RatnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Bolley / Norma Goldman vs Kim Robb / Laurie Student4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Sue Bolley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Norma Goldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Audrey Schwartz
published 3
2.74
2.72
Denise Dennie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Diane Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aileen Jacobs
published 2.5
Gail Voss
published
Lisa Wagner
published
Sharon Sokolsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Goldman + Denise Dennie404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sue Bolley
34W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Norma Goldman
44W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Audrey Schwartz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Barbara Gettenberg
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Denise Dennie
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Diane Kaplan
31W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
2.5
Aileen Jacobs
12W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Voss
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Wagner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Sokolsky
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.