Teams

NorCal/Heimbecker/55&Over8.0MX

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-02vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55MX8.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLiz Lawler / Greg Lawler vs Catharine Garber / David Cao6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLouise Peter / Roman Olmos vs Stephanie King / Dinraj Shetty6-2, 6-2
2025-10-19vs MENLO ATHERTON HS 55MX8.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Cesario / Roman Olmos vs Diane Currie / Philip Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLiz Lawler / Greg Lawler vs Yvonne Selner / Tom Sorenson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Fujieda / Don Scettrini vs Mila Paul / Ravi Mantena6-2, 6-4
2025-08-31vs RINCONADA PK 55MX8.0ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesRoman Olmos / Louise Peter vs Sharon Wang / Bin Wan5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGreg Lawler / Julie Boncher vs Yisong Ye / Amy Mao6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.23
Roman Olmos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Stephen Wullschleger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Don Scettrini
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Michael Rennels
published
3.84
Amy Yang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Tracy Fujieda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Rebecca Passarello
published
3.70
Louise Peter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Julie Yi
published
3.52
Julie Boncher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Janice Passarello
published
3.32
Lisa Cesario
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Liz Lawler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Greg Lawler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marsha Heimbecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 15 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.29
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Stephen Wullschleger
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Don Scettrini
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
Michael Rennels
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Amy Yang
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Tracy Fujieda
28W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Rebecca Passarello
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Louise Peter
33W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Julie Yi
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Julie Boncher
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Janice Passarello
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Lisa Cesario
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Liz Lawler
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Greg Lawler
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Heimbecker
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.