Teams

8-KTravis-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-10vs 3-AHeymann-UNCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracey Maurer / Amber Oberle vs Anne Heymann / Lisa Saenz6-2, 6-0
2024-10-01vs 1-KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Elder / Tracey Maurer vs Ana Goodwin / Valerie Michael6-0, 6-2
2024-09-20vs 2-SSmith-HVCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesColleen Davis / Amy Kell vs Aimee Poduri / Lauren Powell6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Travis / Tracey Maurer vs Lauren Muth Humphreys / Kelly Moore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-06vs 5-OStephens-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Maurer / Joyce Robinson vs Caroline Fungaroli / Ngoc Tran6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-30vs 7-HHutchins-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Maurer / Joyce Robinson vs Keri A Clark / Barbara van Leeuwen4-6, 1-6
2024-08-23vs 4-JRosen-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Kell / Colleen Davis vs Carrie Williamson / Monica Jenkins3-6, 1-6
2024-08-16vs 6-AHoots-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Kell / Becky King vs Cheryl Stevens / Kate Harshbarger6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Amy Kell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Katie Elder
published
3.42
Joyce Robinson
published
3.41
Abigail Hatcher
published 3.5
3.39
Tracey Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Amber Oberle
published 3.5
3.31
Krissy Anderson
published
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
3.10
Emma Gould
published
3.07
Colleen Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Robinson + Tracey Maurer6365% games+7.3% vs expected
Kelly Travis + Abigail Hatcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Kell
185W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Katie Elder
36W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
Joyce Robinson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Tracey Maurer
85W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Amber Oberle
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Krissy Anderson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Emma Gould
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Colleen Davis
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.